Page 2 of 2

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 5:41 pm
by C-dub
Thanks everyone. It is sounding like more of a myth than reality.

As for the pressure differences, I thought they were similar and the differences in pressures was simply because of two difference measuring methods.

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:06 pm
by Richbirdhunter
The Annoyed Man wrote:Hornady Superformance .223 75 grain Match. Nuff said.

I have shot this accurately at 500 yards at Tacpro, dinging a 2/3 scale IPSC steel silhouette target at will at that distance with my 18" DMR. I posted about that range day a year or two back.

I recommend a 1:7 twist for a 75gr bullet.

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:46 pm
by Bitter Clinger
Richbirdhunter wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Hornady Superformance .223 75 grain Match. Nuff said.

I have shot this accurately at 500 yards at Tacpro, dinging a 2/3 scale IPSC steel silhouette target at will at that distance with my 18" DMR. I posted about that range day a year or two back.

I recommend a 1:7 twist for a 75gr bullet.
Agreed! You may find this guidance useful:

Image

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 7:18 pm
by The Annoyed Man
Richbirdhunter wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Hornady Superformance .223 75 grain Match. Nuff said.

I have shot this accurately at 500 yards at Tacpro, dinging a 2/3 scale IPSC steel silhouette target at will at that distance with my 18" DMR. I posted about that range day a year or two back.

I recommend a 1:7 twist for a 75gr bullet.
My DMR has a 1:8 twist, and it was spectacularly accurate....... at least until the wind kicked up.

What 500 yards on a windy day looks like: viewtopic.php?f=87&t=74156&p=933696
Image

That's the 500 yard line in the foreground, and you can see the 400, 300, and 200 yard lines in the distance and in the photo inset.

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:50 pm
by cb1000rider
What do you guys use to spot a .223 hole in paper at 500 yards? Even with a reactive target and 50x spotting scope, I have trouble at 200 yards...

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:08 pm
by C-dub
cb1000rider wrote:What do you guys use to spot a .223 hole in paper at 500 yards? Even with a reactive target and 50x spotting scope, I have trouble at 200 yards...
Probably my truck, but would consider my bicycle.

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:29 pm
by Bitter Clinger
cb1000rider wrote:What do you guys use to spot a .223 hole in paper at 500 yards? Even with a reactive target and 50x spotting scope, I have trouble at 200 yards...
Place it over a steel target backing :cheers2:

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:45 pm
by Pawpaw
cb1000rider wrote:What do you guys use to spot a .223 hole in paper at 500 yards? Even with a reactive target and 50x spotting scope, I have trouble at 200 yards...
I use a 60x spotting scope and someone else's eyes. :lol:

Re: .223 vs 5.56 accuracy beyond 500 yards

Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 1:00 pm
by billfromtx
I can vouch for 500 meters. In the USMC we qualified with the M16 5.56 with a peep sight and post to 500 meters every year.