Re: signs; Armed robbers terrorize suspects in Sugar Land
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:32 am
I wonder if the signs come down now, because if you can't get criminals to obey the law who can you get to?
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
You're assuming that anti-gunners are capable of rational thought.Richbirdhunter wrote:I wonder if the signs come down now, because if you can't get criminals to obey the law who can you get to?
You're ignoring the liberal mindset. When what a liberal does fails to work he doubles down. Obviously, they need more signs or signs with bigger letters, or maybe signs out in the parking lot.Richbirdhunter wrote:I wonder if the signs come down now, because if you can't get criminals to obey the law who can you get to?
You may be correct !VMI77 wrote:You're ignoring the liberal mindset. When what a liberal does fails to work he doubles down. Obviously, they need more signs or signs with bigger letters, or maybe signs out in the parking lot.Richbirdhunter wrote:I wonder if the signs come down now, because if you can't get criminals to obey the law who can you get to?
VMI77 wrote:You guys are all nicer than me....I've got ZERO sympathy.
Minor correction to this part of the story. It is not brazen at all to choose places where you have been assured that no law abiding citizens will be able to resist."To go in with that many people, especially now that people can carry guns, I think that was very bold," said Stavinoha.
I wanted to leave a comment on the story to point that out, but it looks like that feature is disabled.Soccerdad1995 wrote:Minor correction to this part of the story. It is not brazen at all to choose places where you have been assured that no law abiding citizens will be able to resist."To go in with that many people, especially now that people can carry guns, I think that was very bold," said Stavinoha.
I think our time would be better spent asking the owners how they plan to protect their customers after asking them to disarm and then providing inadequate security measures to ensure their safety.GhostTX wrote:The signs did what they were supposed to do: keep law-abiding licensed armed citizens out.
I wanted to leave a comment on the story to point that out, but it looks like that feature is disabled.Soccerdad1995 wrote:Minor correction to this part of the story. It is not brazen at all to choose places where you have been assured that no law abiding citizens will be able to resist."To go in with that many people, especially now that people can carry guns, I think that was very bold," said Stavinoha.