TexasCHLforum.com

Agreed with the last three comments for sure after some research. Milder is way more liberal, and Patterson over Bush for sure - Patterson wrote the chl law in '95 I believe.
Talking about Strauss, prop 3 - Republicans in the House should select their speaker nominee by secret ballot in a binding caucus without Democrat influence.
What negative implications does this have?

locke_n_load wrote:Agreed with the last three comments for sure after some research. Milder is way more liberal, and Patterson over Bush for sure - Patterson wrote the chl law in '95 I believe.
Talking about Strauss, prop 3 - Republicans in the House should select their speaker nominee by secret ballot in a binding caucus without Democrat influence.
What negative implications does this have?

When the Democrats are in power in the House.

TexasJohnBoy wrote:

locke_n_load wrote:Agreed with the last three comments for sure after some research. Milder is way more liberal, and Patterson over Bush for sure - Patterson wrote the chl law in '95 I believe.
Talking about Strauss, prop 3 - Republicans in the House should select their speaker nominee by secret ballot in a binding caucus without Democrat influence.
What negative implications does this have?

When the Democrats are in power in the House.

So should we be voting against this prop?

So Wall (lady always holding a gun) spent 6 million of her own money and got 12,000 votes. The Navy seal got about the same and a guy I don't know at all who is a lawyer won. He was endorsed by the NRA and apparently is a deacon at his Champions church.

The pretty Sarah won by just a little bit, despite being accused of being friends with Wendy.

The Dems didn't seem to get as many votes as the Republicans, if you total them up. So if everyone votes in November, Texas should stay red.