Page 2 of 10
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:38 am
by Paladin
The Outfit needs their "cut"
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2019 8:45 am
by philip964
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/bre ... story.html
Chicago teachers union Venezuela trip praises Maduro.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 12:39 pm
by philip964
https://news.yahoo.com/online-tool-trac ... 13032.html
New online tool to track Chicago gun charges.
Kinda like a sex offenders registry, except no ones been convicted and it’s about guns.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:48 pm
by ELB
Finally found “gun registry” that the left doesn't like.
Cops put together a website that shows how unserious The Chicago judicial system is about “gun violence”. They are arresting felons in possession and other serious crimes involving guns, but the judges are giving low bails So the bad guys just go right back out on the street and do it again, knowing they’re not going to be seriously inconvenienced by the courts.
In the meantime the city government, the far left mayor is blaming the police for all the shootings. The new mayor canceled all summer leave for everyone in the police department because their violence problem is so serious...and then went off on her own vacation recently.
The cops are fighting back by using existing public information about who gets arrested to point out that the city government and the courts really don’t give a flip about holding to account those responsible for “gun crimes”, they’re just pandering to the rich white left wingers and the poor black gangs at the same time, Call blaming the cops for all the problems.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:49 pm
by ELB
Finally a found “gun registry” that the left doesn't like.
Cops put together a website that shows how unserious The Chicago judicial system is about “gun violence”. They are arresting felons in possession and other serious crimes involving guns, but the judges are giving low bails So the bad guys just go right back out on the street and do it again, knowing they’re not going to be seriously inconvenienced by the courts.
In the meantime the city government, the far left mayor is blaming the police for all the shootings. The new mayor canceled all summer leave for everyone in the police department because their violence problem is so serious...and then went off on her own vacation recently.
The cops are fighting back by using existing public information about who gets arrested to point out that the city government and the courts really don’t give a flip about holding to account those responsible for “gun crimes”, they’re just pandering to the rich white left wingers and the poor black gangs at the same time, while blaming the cops for all the problems.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:59 am
by philip964
https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local ... 7c492d536b
Bill to takes Guns away from scary social media posts.
Provide social media posts before you can get a gun.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 11:10 am
by OneGun
So much for freedom of speech! If you exercise your 1st Amendment right, you may lose your 2nd Amendment right. I doubt this will hold-up at the SCOTUS.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 11:07 pm
by philip964
https://cwbchicago.com/2019/12/citizen- ... r-too.html
Robber beats and robs a CTA passenger.
Robber held at gun point by another passenger.
Good Samaritan had a valid Firearm Owner ID.
Charges are pending against the Good Samaritan.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:44 am
by oohrah
Problem is Good Samaritan did NOT have a CCL, and was in a legally posted prohibited place. This will not end well for GS.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:49 am
by OneGun
oohrah wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:44 am
Problem is Good Samaritan did NOT have a CCL, and was in a legally posted prohibited place. This will not end well for GS.
For those that may not be aware, the state of Illannoy prohibits CCL license holders from carrying in criminal activity zones such as all publicly funded transportation. In Illannoy, the bus and train lines are criminal activity magnets because criminals know that victims are defenseless.
I still do not understand the Demoncrat logic behind this rationale.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:07 am
by E10
That’s an oxymoron: “Democrat logic.”
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 11:51 am
by OneGun
E10 wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 10:07 am
That’s an oxymoron: “
Democrat logic.”
But I actually wrote "Demo
ncrat Logic"
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:13 pm
by philip964
https://www.dailywire.com/news/chicago- ... or-slavery
Chicago suburb (Evanston) City Council votes to pay Slavery reparations.
Dispute on whether cash or assistance (college, housing)
No test as to whether your family history includes former slaves. No percentage reductions for mixed race. No DNA tests. Money from Legal pot sales taxes. I assume African Americans only need apply, but may include persons who identify as African American.
Re: No place but Chicago or Illinois
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 6:36 pm
by OneGun
philip964 wrote: Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:13 pm
https://www.dailywire.com/news/chicago- ... or-slavery
Chicago suburb (Evanston) City Council votes to pay Slavery reparations.
Dispute on whether cash or assistance (college, housing)
No test as to whether your family history includes former slaves. No percentage reductions for mixed race. No DNA tests. Money from Legal pot sales taxes. I assume African Americans only need apply, but may include persons who identify as African American.
Let's make sure I understand. People who never owned slaves are going to pay money to people that were never slaves? Why?
“Evanston leaders say they see the dispensaries as an opportunity to pay for a local reparations program that would address the lingering institutional effects of slavery and discrimination,” the Tribune says.
“The tax on marijuana will ‘be invested in the community it unfairly policed and damaged,'” according to one supporter of the measure. “The plan stems from the idea that African Americans should disproportionately benefit from the sale of cannabis … because they have been disproportionately affected by the policing of marijuana — both nationally and locally.”
So, if African-Americans do not use marijuana, they won't be disproportionately affected by policing! Isn't that the answer??