TexasCHLforum.com

MeMelYup wrote:

rbwhatever1 wrote:CNN must have had screen settings too bright when they posted their version of this selfie...

One of them has been photoshopped, look at his nose and lips.

I don't usually prescribe to conspiracy theories, but this along with other things I'm seeing associated with this shooting are making me feel uneasy.

Give it a few months and you'll see a Confederate Flag in the background...

philip964 wrote:http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/vide ... -religion/

Says the shooter is Muslim leaning. Can't vouch for the website, maybe just wishful thinking on their part.

My anti gun friends on Facebook are moving towards Bernie Sanders, but only if he changes his gun stance.

I've seen that on the web as well, but I think it is wishful thinking. If anything, the guy was a Satanist, and I'm not even certain that is accurate. He might be described as atheist, although that's not really accurate either. Frankly the guy was all over the place. He was anti-religion, yet he was into some sort of weird spiritualism.

Maybe schools should be required to have armed guards in every student-occupied building where carry is not allowed.

Modifying his photo like that to mislead people should be criminal. That is just about as low as they can get. They wonder why they have no credibility.

mojo84 wrote:Modifying his photo like that to mislead people should be criminal. That is just about as low as they can get. They wonder why they have no credibility.

But it's just as likely that itvwas done by others and just blamed on CNN or whoever. Certainly many details and their attributed sources are faked and being use by all sorts.

EEllis wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Modifying his photo like that to mislead people should be criminal. That is just about as low as they can get. They wonder why they have no credibility.

But it's just as likely that itvwas done by others and just blamed on CNN or whoever. Certainly many details and their attributed sources are faked and being use by all sorts.

Nothing you said changes my opinion about this or CNN's credibility. Not going to argue with you just to fulfill your need to argue. Your weak arguents have never not once changed my opinion. It won't start now. Go try to play your game with someone else.

rbwhatever1 wrote:CNN must have had screen settings too bright when they posted their version of this selfie...

I haven't been able to independent verify this change by CNN. Most websites seem to be repeating the same two photos but nothing else to show it on CNN. If someone has a link to confirm this, I'd like to see it.

Father that abandoned son at birth blames guns.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -to-blame/


Edited: Not sure if he abandoned him at birth or not. Other sources say several years ago. Too much incorrect info out here to keep it all straight.

mojo84 wrote:Father that abandoned son at birth blames guns.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -to-blame/

Of course! Personal responsibility is almost nonexistent these days. It is always easier to blame it on someone else. Even better if you can blame an object because there is no chance the object can defend itself.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/02/us/oregon ... -shooting/

Murderer shot himself, not shot by police.

As in other mass murders,
when faced with bullets come his way he kills himself.

All guns legally purchased.

Edit: the article also noted that the shooter reloaded, rather than using one of his other guns.

Edit: my favorite quote for today was from NBC news. "But J.J. Vicari, who was in the classroom next to the where the attack occurred, said he never heard the gunman ask about religion and never even heard the gunman's voice."

Here it appears CNN is denying running any pictures of the shooter much less the altered one.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/10 ... ook-white/

Nonetheless, my opinion of CNN remains unchanged.

EEllis wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Modifying his photo like that to mislead people should be criminal. That is just about as low as they can get. They wonder why they have no credibility.

But it's just as likely that it was done by others and just blamed on CNN or whoever. Certainly many details and their attributed sources are faked and being use by all sorts.

I looked for this photo at CNN but couldn't find it. This kind of reporting makes no sense at all for CNN but there is always some who will believe anything. If one can't provide a respected reference for something controversial on Internet it's probably trash and shouldn't be passed on.

mojo84 wrote:

EEllis wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Modifying his photo like that to mislead people should be criminal. That is just about as low as they can get. They wonder why they have no credibility.

But it's just as likely that itvwas done by others and just blamed on CNN or whoever. Certainly many details and their attributed sources are faked and being use by all sorts.

Nothing you said changes my opinion about this or CNN's credibility. Not going to argue with you just to fulfill your need to argue. Your weak arguents have never not once changed my opinion. It won't start now. Go try to play your game with someone else.

Get a grip dude. There is no argument just a caution that CNN may of had nothing to do with the photo.

mojo84 wrote:Here it appears CNN is denying running any pictures of the shooter much less the altered one.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/10 ... ook-white/

Nonetheless, my opinion of CNN remains unchanged.

Congratulations? Was that ever an issue or concern, because I missed that if it was.