TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:[ Image ]

P.S.: Stop the condescending statements.

tbrown wrote:

P.S.: Stop the condescending statements.

Good advice. Romney's supporters would have won over a lot more conservatives if they followed this strategy.

WASHINGTON — Nearly 16 months after first pledging to help Egypt’s failing economy, the Obama administration is nearing an agreement with the country’s new government to relieve $1 billion of its debt as part of an American and international assistance package intended to bolster its transition to democracy, administration officials said.

The Annoyed Man wrote:U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 3, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/world ... ml?_r=1&hp

WASHINGTON — Nearly 16 months after first pledging to help Egypt’s failing economy, the Obama administration is nearing an agreement with the country’s new government to relieve $1 billion of its debt as part of an American and international assistance package intended to bolster its transition to democracy, administration officials said.

So basically, Obama is going to borrow money from China, increasing our debt, so he can give money to Egyptians.

And we should reelect this guy why?

The Annoyed Man wrote:U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 3, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/world ... ml?_r=1&hp

WASHINGTON — Nearly 16 months after first pledging to help Egypt’s failing economy, the Obama administration is nearing an agreement with the country’s new government to relieve $1 billion of its debt as part of an American and international assistance package intended to bolster its transition to democracy, administration officials said.

So basically, Obama is going to borrow money from China, increasing our debt, so he can give money to Egyptians.

And we should reelect this guy why?

tbrown wrote:

P.S.: Stop the condescending statements.

Good advice. Romney's supporters would have won over a lot more conservatives if they followed this strategy.

Fox wrote:If you want to understand why President Obama has run such a scorchingly negative campaign, consider this: In a new poll conducted for The Hill, only 40 percent of likely voters said they felt Obama deserves a second term. Fifty-two percent said he did not.

Republicans complain about the tone and tenor of Obama's months of character attacks on GOP nominee Mitt Romney, but the Hill poll shows us exactly what Obama's internal polling has likely been telling him for months. There is no chance of the incumbent winning if the election is about him. So it needs to be about somebody else.

TheHill wrote:The Hill’s polling shows skepticism about the president is entrenched among coveted centrist voters who are key to the election outcome.

Fifty-two percent of centrists said Obama does not deserve reelection based on his job performance, 56 percent are unsatisfied with his handling of the economy and 53 percent feel the country is worse off.
...........................
Among “other” voters — those who said they were neither Democrats nor Republicans — 61 percent say Obama does not deserve reelection.

The Obama campaign’s challenges extend to voters of all ages.

Among those aged 18-39 — a voting bloc that helped push Obama to victory in 2008 — 51 percent said the president does not deserve reelection, while 40 percent said he does.

Anti-Obama sentiment is strongest among seniors, the poll found. Sixty-five percent of voters aged 65 and over said Obama shouldn’t get a second term, while 53 percent of voters 40-64 years old feel the same.

Obama is also facing stiff headwinds on the economy among lower-middle-class and middle-class voters.

Among voters earning $40,000 to $60,000 a year, 67 percent said they were not satisfied with the president’s handling of the economy and 62 percent said the country is in worse condition now than in 2008.

Similarly, 58 percent of people earning between $20,000 and $40,000 a year said the country is worse off now, and 66 percent are unhappy with his handling of the economy.

The Annoyed Man wrote:U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 3, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/world ... ml?_r=1&hp

WASHINGTON — Nearly 16 months after first pledging to help Egypt’s failing economy, the Obama administration is nearing an agreement with the country’s new government to relieve $1 billion of its debt as part of an American and international assistance package intended to bolster its transition to democracy, administration officials said.

So basically, Obama is going to borrow money from China, increasing our debt, so he can give money to Egyptians.

And we should reelect this guy why?

baldeagle wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:U.S. Prepares Economic Aid to Bolster Democracy in Egypt
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 3, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/04/world ... ml?_r=1&hp

WASHINGTON — Nearly 16 months after first pledging to help Egypt’s failing economy, the Obama administration is nearing an agreement with the country’s new government to relieve $1 billion of its debt as part of an American and international assistance package intended to bolster its transition to democracy, administration officials said.

So basically, Obama is going to borrow money from China, increasing our debt, so he can give money to Egyptians.

And we should reelect this guy why?

Who, BTW, are now crucifying Christians in Egypt. Yes, you heard that right. They are crucifying Christians, just like in the good ole days. And no, it's not a hoax, as the liberals would have you believe. http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/video-report ... cifixions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

tbrown wrote:

P.S.: Stop the condescending statements.

Good advice. Romney's supporters would have won over a lot more conservatives if they followed this strategy.

Romney supporters are conservatives and the only fellow conservatives I know who are not going to vote for him are few in number. I don't consider Ron Paul supporters conservatives; they tend to be Libertarians who cannot be classified as conservatives or liberals because the Libertarian Party Platform is both ultraconservative and ultraliberal, depending upon the issue.

Chas.

glockstero wrote:A vote for anyone but Romney is a wasted vote unless you want obama to win.