The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Means it won't be added to the current bill for eventual consideration.CrimsonSoul wrote:What does amendment tabled mean anyway?
Exactly. You can go in/out/in/out of the city of Dallas a dozen times in 15 minutes of driving.mojo84 wrote:Just think of the people that live in the DFW cluster of cities. What a mess this would cause.
It means the amendment is effectively deadCrimsonSoul wrote:What does amendment tabled mean anyway?
I never know what city I am in when I am in DFW.TVGuy wrote:Exactly. You can go in/out/in/out of the city of Dallas a dozen times in 15 minutes of driving.mojo84 wrote:Just think of the people that live in the DFW cluster of cities. What a mess this would cause.
It's been awhile but cities had some ability to limit unlicensed carry in certain places but not an entire city. They could not with licensed carry.mojo84 wrote:TXBO wrote:Unless Arizona has changed since I lived there, he is incorrect.mojo84 wrote:Johnson was calling out cities that restrict guns and included "Arizona".
He also called a bunch of cities that restrict guns and have the highest crime rates. Surprised?
Now it's a race issue. Geez!!!
I have never lived in Arizona but I always thought it was a state. Am I wrong?
It's kind of like the time Mike Tyson was asked what he will when he retired. His response was "I'll probably settle down somewhere in the outskirts of Illinois".
Same for the mid-cities. It would be an absolute disaster if that passed.TVGuy wrote:Exactly. You can go in/out/in/out of the city of Dallas a dozen times in 15 minutes of driving.mojo84 wrote:Just think of the people that live in the DFW cluster of cities. What a mess this would cause.
TXBO wrote:It's been awhile but cities had some ability to limit unlicensed carry in certain places but not an entire city. They could not with licensed carry.mojo84 wrote:TXBO wrote:Unless Arizona has changed since I lived there, he is incorrect.mojo84 wrote:Johnson was calling out cities that restrict guns and included "Arizona".
He also called a bunch of cities that restrict guns and have the highest crime rates. Surprised?
Now it's a race issue. Geez!!!
I have never lived in Arizona but I always thought it was a state. Am I wrong?
It's kind of like the time Mike Tyson was asked what he will when he retired. His response was "I'll probably settle down somewhere in the outskirts of Illinois".
mojo84 wrote:LOL! Sorry Mojo. Please "table my response" with the rest of these silly amendments.TXBO wrote:It's been awhile but cities had some ability to limit unlicensed carry in certain places but not an entire city. They could not with licensed carry.mojo84 wrote:TXBO wrote:Unless Arizona has changed since I lived there, he is incorrect.mojo84 wrote:Johnson was calling out cities that restrict guns and included "Arizona".
He also called a bunch of cities that restrict guns and have the highest crime rates. Surprised?
Now it's a race issue. Geez!!!
I have never lived in Arizona but I always thought it was a state. Am I wrong?
It's kind of like the time Mike Tyson was asked what he will when he retired. His response was "I'll probably settle down somewhere in the outskirts of Illinois".
OK. I am not talking about what the Arizona preemption law as I know little to nothing about it. I am making a JOKE about the guy listing Arizona along with cities.
TXBO wrote:mojo84 wrote:LOL! Sorry Mojo. Please "table my response" with the rest of these silly amendments.TXBO wrote:It's been awhile but cities had some ability to limit unlicensed carry in certain places but not an entire city. They could not with licensed carry.mojo84 wrote:TXBO wrote:Unless Arizona has changed since I lived there, he is incorrect.mojo84 wrote:Johnson was calling out cities that restrict guns and included "Arizona".
He also called a bunch of cities that restrict guns and have the highest crime rates. Surprised?
Now it's a race issue. Geez!!!
I have never lived in Arizona but I always thought it was a state. Am I wrong?
It's kind of like the time Mike Tyson was asked what he will when he retired. His response was "I'll probably settle down somewhere in the outskirts of Illinois".
OK. I am not talking about what the Arizona preemption law as I know little to nothing about it. I am making a JOKE about the guy listing Arizona along with cities.
