Page 3 of 3
Re: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 2:57 pm
by ELB
I’ve read other accounts that say the vehicle had a separate inner metal wall, separate from the carbon fiber hull, and the monitor mount is screwed into the inner wall, not the pressure hull.
Re: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 3:05 pm
by philip964
ELB wrote: Mon Jun 26, 2023 2:57 pm
I’ve read other accounts that say the vehicle had a separate inner metal wall, separate from the carbon fiber hull, and the monitor mount is screwed into the inner wall, not the pressure hull.
Yes I’m being told that it is an inner carbon fiber wall not the actual carbon fiber hill. I suspect maybe there is a foam insulation between the two. That would make sense.
It was not going deeper than it had been before, so fatigue may have caused the failure, rather than stress cracks from these screws.
Re: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2023 10:59 pm
by G.A. Heath
Navy subs which have tons of money, R&D, testing, and standards have a certain number of times they can dive before they are considered unsafe. This sub was built on a shoe string budget, one (possibly the only) engineer involved in it's development had concerns about the safety of the thing so he got fired, and it had other concerns.