Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:08 pm
by ThunderDownUnder
Golly gosh , where to begin!
Let me try to swerve back on topic.

Hey GigAg!

I really hate net forums like this as a way to discuss these issues because it's a relatively slow medium to converse in.
And since all are CHL's and have a signed,sworn Knowledge Of Laws affadavit on file with DPS :shock: , we all are fully and completely aware of Ch.46 and Ch. 9 of the Texas Penal Code. :shock: Hey we all know the answers. ;-) Or at least we have signed that we do. So... we already know all the right answers, right? :lol:

I'm going to give you a counterpoint to what you have previously asked and your response. I'll approach it the way we have discussions of this nature in my classes when we get to Use of Force and Chapter 9.

First: Your bud is walking home with the girlfriend ( you didn't tell us, is she hot?) ;-) late at night. Oddball runs around and gets in a trail position. The girl wisely picks up on it, guy slowly recognizes potential threat. I really like the part where he tells her if the other guy makes a move towards them, she should run in the house lock the door, call the cops. Sounds good. If the other guy doesn't attack, it will be a short call, probably slower response time and the police are aware of a prowler. Still sounds good. I'm glad your bud ran in the house behind her.

Now, what would you do? Walking the girl home ( I know if she's with you, she's hot!) :lol: , strange guy starts going back and forth and falls into a trail position, starts closing. You tell the girl to do the same thing as before. If he makes a run at you, you stall him, she runs in the house and calls the cops.
How do you handle it ( the potential threat)?
In one statement , you referred to the event as "the assault". What did the guy do? I must have missed something. Was he just acting suspicious and following you? Is that what you refer to as "the assault"?
Or does he actually confront you OR use force OR commit a crime?
In these discussions, the first thing I ask is .....What Crime is being committed?????
What's the crime? What's the crime?

Is following someone an "assault"? Not really in my book.
Assuming that he has not used any force against you, can you legally draw and point your handgun at him?

Let's see... "the threat of force is justified when force is justified"?
Are you justified in using force to , what , stop someone from following you? You can use the threat of deadly force by producing a weapon when force is justified , provided you limit it to create an apprehension. Basically bluff the guy. But , if he has not committed a crime or attacked you, I think pulling the handgun and especially announcing a threat with the handgun is a very risky move. I have had one student(52YO man) get intimidated and he pulled a shotgun on a very tall 16 year old kid in his yard and the CHL was convicted of deadly conduct. The kid was standing there waiting for a ride from a friend at 3am.

Here's a bad example: The stalker follows you, the hot girlfriend makes a break for the door and you turn and say,"STOP - I am feeling threatened by you, I am armed and willing to defend myself" .

He stops and then gets scared, spots a passing police car ( because CSPD cars are alwaysin the wrong place at the wrong time) and runs towards it and says "help, that guy over there has a gun and is going to shoot me!" What happens then? I have no good news for you in this scenario. What if he was just out looking for his little Chihuahua dog late at night and was trying to catch up to you and ask you if you had seen him? Maybe he just made it up, but it could sound plausible to the cops and you were the one holding the gun on him...... :sad:

I would agree with the others that a can of Criminal Hygeine Spray (Deftec) would be a good supplement to your handgun. It's a good alternative.

Back in the good old days at the beginning of the CHL program , more instructors used to cover the Use of Force Continuum and Verbal Judo. Basically, if you have time and distance, verbally call out to the guy. Hey what going on? Non-confrontationally ask , do you need some help? If he doesn't respond verbally and closes the gap , move back and prepare for a force or deadly force encounter.
I'm saying this in a legal context, not necessarily in a physical, self-defense context. Things can change very, very fast. Of course, you know how to be prepared and are alert.

My basic point is, be very careful in drawing your gun out of concealment too quick.

One other anecdote from a former student. He( 58 YO white male) , the wife , kid and grandkids went to a high school football playoff game. Their team won. When they were exiting the parking lot, logjam ensued. A car full of the other teams supporters wanted to get in front of our CHL. He would not let them in. They cursed the CHL, spit at him, and finally got out and kicked his front quarterpanel. They other party then challenged the CHL to "get out be a man, show what a tough guy you are ."
The CHL lasted with about ten minutes of good Verbal Judo, not taking the bait then finally when the other driver got right up to his window and said he wanted him to get out, our CHL said, "Nope, this is a fight you can't win. " I know you can kick my ass but I not going to let it get that far. You'll have a bullet hole in you before that happens." The other driver asked if he had a gun. The CHL nodded affirmative. And then the problems began. Several bystanders and fans of the losing team, all called the police. The police arrived and ended up arrestting the CHL for failure to conceal. They said that his acknowledgement that he had a gun constituted an intentional failure to conceal violation. He was arrested.
$11,000 later the charges were dropped and he is asking for an expungement. He still does not have his handgun back. The ADA (the CHL says she is a little bitch with a bad anti-gun attitude) told him that if he continues trying to get his gun back, she will file Disorderly Conduct charges on him.

Sorry for being long-winded but the pattern that I detect has been that what CHLs say when carrying their CHLs, get them in the most trouble in real life. Of course, if he is a threat and I didn't have to worry about someone overhearing me, I would give him a few profane words without exposing the fact that I was carrying a handgun. :twisted:

Also, I have started discussing more with students about avoiding getting fantasy gun fight scenarios locked into your mind. Because.... it nevers plays out the way you expect. That's why being mentally, emtionally and spiritually prepared is so important.

Gig'em
J '83 -ECON

Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:03 pm
by nitrogen
ThunderDownUnder wrote: One other anecdote from a former student. He( 58 YO white male) , the wife , kid and grandkids went to a high school football playoff game.

...

" I know you can kick my ass but I not going to let it get that far. You'll have a bullet hole in you before that happens." The other driver asked if he had a gun. The CHL nodded affirmative. And then the problems began. Several bystanders and fans of the losing team, all called the police. The police arrived and ended up arrestting the CHL for failure to conceal. They said that his acknowledgement that he had a gun constituted an intentional failure to conceal violation. He was arrested.
Wouldn't he be in more trouble for carrying at a sporting event, and on school grounds?

Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:56 pm
by Crossfire
ThunderDownUnder wrote: Wouldn't he be in more trouble for carrying at a sporting event, and on school grounds?
You picked right up on that one! But, I'm gonna say, since he was leaving the game, that he had his handgun locked away safely in the trunk during the game. Still legal.

But that doesn't help his later problem. You can't produce a handgun in response to a verbal threat. And threatening to "put a bullet hole" in someone is just as bad as producing the firearm.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 1:25 am
by gigag04
llwatson wrote:You can't produce a handgun in response to a verbal threat alone
FYP :)

llwatson wrote: And threatening to "put a bullet hole" in someone is just as bad as producing the firearm.
I'm not convinced here - my understanding that words are just that....words. This also kinda contradicts your previous statement. If someone pulls a gun at me, that is a defense for me pulling (and using) mine. If someone says they will put a bullet hole in me, it is not a proper nor defendable action to pull mine.

From my CHL class, I walked away with an understanding that words alone are not grounds for much of anything. Which is why I can say something like I'll shoot the crap out of you if you keep coming towards me, but that is not failure to conceal it's just saying something.

I could be off on this, and as such, I don't want to this to degenerate into e-bickering....been seeing enough of that lately.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 7:28 am
by Crossfire
Yes, words are just words. But if you threaten to "shoot the crap" out of someone, and he reports that you threatened him with a gun, and you DO have a handgun, then whose side do you think the police are going to take?

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:36 am
by lrb111
llwatson wrote:Yes, words are just words. But if you threaten to "shoot the crap" out of someone, and he reports that you threatened him with a gun, and you DO have a handgun, then whose side do you think the police are going to take?
hmmm,

A. the guy beating on the window screaming threats,

B. The fellow hiding in the car.

:cool:

words are just words?

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 9:09 am
by switch
That's right. And that is what was finally determined (charges were dropped) $11,000 later. :sad:

Sure, he could hire an attorney to get his gun back. What would that cost? Might be cheaper to buy a replacement. ;-)

Did he get his license suspended? back?

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 12:17 pm
by ElGato
The attorney should have made getting the gun back part of the deal when the charges were dropped, although that shouldn't be necessary,unless the DA keeping the gun was part of the deal that was made.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 1:54 pm
by Paladin
lrb111 wrote:
llwatson wrote:Yes, words are just words. But if you threaten to "shoot the crap" out of someone, and he reports that you threatened him with a gun, and you DO have a handgun, then whose side do you think the police are going to take?
hmmm,

A. the guy beating on the window screaming threats,

B. The fellow hiding in the car.

:cool:
Yep. If that story went down as told, there should have been Disorderly Conduct charges out of that incident... against A. the guy beating on the window screaming threats

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 4:10 pm
by ElGato
In real life whoever calls the cop's and presses charges is on the other's 20 yd. line.

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 1:42 pm
by Flatland2D
ThunderDownUnder wrote:"Nope, this is a fight you can't win. " I know you can kick my butt but I not going to let it get that far. You'll have a bullet hole in you before that happens." The other driver asked if he had a gun. The CHL nodded affirmative.
First this was a great lesson and thanks for sharing. I'm a little surprised he was charged with failure to conceal, but I guess I can see their point.

What if the CHL, when asked if he had a gun, took a polite as possible "you tell me" attitude? He wouldn't have admitted to anything, so what could they charge him with?

I've wondered myself what I would say in a situation when asked if I have a gun and I figured not clearly answering their question would be the best bet, like saying "you tell me" (not in a threatening manner though, almost jokingly). On one hand I wouldn't want them to think "ok this guy isn't armed, let's jump him," but I also couldn't afford the $11,000 legal bill and possible jail time for saying "yes."

Let's say the CHL's reponse stopped with, "this is one fight you can't win," not including the bullet hole threat. The driver of the other car makes the connection and asks if he has a gun. What would you guys say?

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 5:43 pm
by lrb111
Flatland2D wrote:The driver of the other car makes the connection and asks if he has a gun. What would you guys say?
If somene asks, and i am not carrying, I can say No.
But if I am I can't respond affirmatively.

Seems like this isn't helpful to the "carrier, and could be considered some kind of trap for an assailant. That's not the best wording, I'm sure.

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 6:43 pm
by KBCraig
"What, are you carrying a gun or sumthin'?"

"That's a risk you'll have to take."

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 7:06 pm
by nitrogen
KBCraig wrote:"What, are you carrying a gun or sumthin'?"
Something.

Works in either case.

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 11:13 pm
by KD5NRH
lrb111 wrote: If somene asks, and i am not carrying, I can say No.
But if I am I can't respond affirmatively.
But could you actually get in any trouble for saying no if it's not true? (Assuming, of course, that the questioner has not ID'd as a LEO.)