TexasCHLforum.com

I carry a Kimber Pro CDP. The XD40 Sub is an excellent choice.
The 1911 platform is my preference. I dont think anyone can add a lot to jbenat's post.
Everyone ought to have a 1911. Carry what you are proficient with.

I am looking for a sub-compact 1911 to add to my collection. Had a full size Kimber several years ago and had nothing but problems with it. Three trips back to the factory and it still had FTF and FTE's with all types of ammo.

Are they any better now?

I've had my Kimber for only 3 mo. Haven't had any problems but haven't had it that long.

RPBrown wrote:I am looking for a sub-compact 1911 to add to my collection. Had a full size Kimber several years ago and had nothing but problems with it. Three trips back to the factory and it still had FTF and FTE's with all types of ammo.

Are they any better now?

My first Kimber was a Custom Target, Series 1, purchased about 1996 or 97. Some significant break-in--to the tune of over 500 rounds--was required before I became comfortable it had stopped its frequent FTFs and FTRTBs, never had any FTEs, though (this was before they went to the external extractor for a while). I also experimented with different magazines, and finally settled on Wilson's, and that also made a big difference. The pistol went back to Kimber once for a little feed-ramp polishing.

When I picked up my newest Kimber just before Christmas, something I'd heard about but hadn't seen firsthand was that this thing looked used. It looked like it had a hundred rounds down the pipe, and had been stuck back into its case with not so much as wipe-off. And that's just about the truth. Kimbers are being test fired much more at the factory now than they used to be, and they evidently want you to see that because in addition to your test target, you get a filthy gun.

The only real knocks ever against the Kimbers were MIM parts (which doesn't really bother me), and factory tolerances that sacrificed reliability. I'd hazard that most folks who've bought a Kimber in the past couple of years will say that the reliability is fine. My new one has had two range trips with just over 300 rounds through it, and not a single hiccup. I think Kimber wised up and realized they had done a great job quickly securing a big chunk of market share, but would lose it if their products gained a stigma of unreliability. And I think that's even more valid once they really started courting the concealed carry market and introducing more and more compact models.

I fully expected a few FTFs with my new gun. I wouldn't have been disappointed with it if I had one or two per hundred during break-in. That I've had zero has come as a surprise to me. Of course, I have yet to really stress it with a couple hundred rounds of different ammo types at a single session; that'll come later this month. So in that regard, Kimber has exceeded my expectations about reliability of the new 1911. Your mileage may vary, but I think you'll find more folks happy with newer Kimbers than not.

Really good review skiprr.
That from an unbiased owner.

I've got an Ultra Carry II, and it has functioned flawlessly for over 1000 rounds.

RPBrown wrote:I am looking for a sub-compact 1911 to add to my collection. Had a full size Kimber several years ago and had nothing but problems with it. Three trips back to the factory and it still had FTF and FTE's with all types of ammo.

Are they any better now?

I have had my CDP to several schools shooting just <1000 rounds each, never a hiccup. I also shoot it extensively with zero problems.

My warrior has not been to a school with me, but I have not had any issues with it either.

Any idea if one can get the Taurus PT1911 in stainless as opposed to Blue Steel?

Thanks
David

texas297 wrote:Any idea if one can get the Taurus PT1911 in stainless as opposed to Blue Steel?

Yeppers! You sure can:

http://www.taurususa.com/products/produ ... ory=Pistol

Congrats and welcome to the 1911 club ! :)

I love my Kimber and lust for the Eclipse Ultra model. Maybe some day !

texas297 wrote:Any idea if one can get the Taurus PT1911 in stainless as opposed to Blue Steel?

Although it's been on their website for some time, it actually hasn't been released yet. Best bet is early this year.

Watch this forum for the latest news when it happens.

http://forum.m1911.org/forumdisplay.php?f=115

Mike1951 wrote:

texas297 wrote:Any idea if one can get the Taurus PT1911 in stainless as opposed to Blue Steel?

Although it's been on their website for some time, it actually hasn't been released yet. Best bet is early this year.

Watch this forum for the latest news when it happens.

http://forum.m1911.org/forumdisplay.php?f=115

Thanks Mike, bookmarked!

David

The forum owner there is hoping to return from the SHOT show with better info on the stainless and compact models.

But if any list member gets his hands on one, it will be reported there.

Reysc wrote:

TX Rancher wrote:

Reysc wrote:Anyway, welcome to the 1911 world!! I got in maybe six months ago and I have five 1911's..I just need one more and I'm done. I need to have a Les Baer or a Wison Combat!! Oh goodness!!!
ReySC

Now you see, there's your problem. You have this 1911 thing all wrong. First of all, you never have enough and you never say only one more unless your talking to the boss (you know, your wife or major female in your life).

I need to have a Les Baer or a Wilson? Come on, it should be Les Baer and a Wilson.

Wrightcrew:

The folks are right, there's no turning back now. Welcome into the light, John Moses Browning is pleased you have now found "The True Way.

You are right, TX Rancher!! You see I was in a denial mode.. LOL!!

Every held or better yet SHOT a Dane Burns Custom....