The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Sarah N Jeremy Alcede
If this passes is it really the worst thing in the world? Hardly. If you don't want to be on a report don't buy more than 1000 rounds in a 5 day period. Just like many of you won't buy 2 or more handguns in 5 days. At this stage it isn't worded that ammo will be restricted, just that large purchases be reported. Also that ammo must be purchased at a brick and mortar store just like firearms, which I am not totally opposed to. Think about it, if you are not able to legally purchase a firearm there are ways of getting One through a third party, on the streets, black market- call it what you want. Purchasing ammo online makes it easier for these guys to load those weapons and cause harm. Maybe if ammo sales are restricted to real store fronts it may cut down on some of that action. Guns are useless without bullets.
I wish I could afford to buy ammo in bigger purchases...I most certainly would. The more you buy at a time, the better the per-round price usually is...you can see that in by-the-case deals many of the on-line retailers usually have...once again, I think this guy was only concerned about HIS bottom line and visions of increased revenue streams dancing through his head. Truly a case of "open mouth, insert foot".XinTX wrote:I find his 'retraction' a bit insencere. After the initial interview he posted this on his FB page (since removed):
Sarah N Jeremy Alcede
If this passes is it really the worst thing in the world? Hardly. If you don't want to be on a report don't buy more than 1000 rounds in a 5 day period. Just like many of you won't buy 2 or more handguns in 5 days. At this stage it isn't worded that ammo will be restricted, just that large purchases be reported. Also that ammo must be purchased at a brick and mortar store just like firearms, which I am not totally opposed to. Think about it, if you are not able to legally purchase a firearm there are ways of getting One through a third party, on the streets, black market- call it what you want. Purchasing ammo online makes it easier for these guys to load those weapons and cause harm. Maybe if ammo sales are restricted to real store fronts it may cut down on some of that action. Guns are useless without bullets.
That ain't true and I think this guy perfectly knows that... he isn't very good at damage control!Also that ammo must be purchased at a brick and mortar store just like firearms, which I am not totally opposed to.
He admits that guns can be bought "through a third party, on the streets, black market . . . " instead of buying at a "brick and mortar store." It's noteworthy that he wasn't as candid about ammo being purchased the same way. So the only people who will feel the impact on restrictions on the method of purchasing ammo would be law-abiding citizens -- the same ones who would be forced to buy at his store. Interesting.XinTX wrote:I find his 'retraction' a bit insencere. After the initial interview he posted this on his FB page (since removed):
Sarah N Jeremy Alcede
If this passes is it really the worst thing in the world? Hardly. If you don't want to be on a report don't buy more than 1000 rounds in a 5 day period. Just like many of you won't buy 2 or more handguns in 5 days. At this stage it isn't worded that ammo will be restricted, just that large purchases be reported. Also that ammo must be purchased at a brick and mortar store just like firearms, which I am not totally opposed to. Think about it, if you are not able to legally purchase a firearm there are ways of getting One through a third party, on the streets, black market- call it what you want. Purchasing ammo online makes it easier for these guys to load those weapons and cause harm. Maybe if ammo sales are restricted to real store fronts it may cut down on some of that action. Guns are useless without bullets.
That's not a retraction, he's further clarifying what he really means and it's not favorable. I don't into Katy much but I know plenty of people that do. I will be sure to spread the word that his door is not worth darkening.XinTX wrote:I find his 'retraction' a bit insencere. After the initial interview he posted this on his FB page (since removed):
Sarah N Jeremy Alcede
If this passes is it really the worst thing in the world? Hardly. If you don't want to be on a report don't buy more than 1000 rounds in a 5 day period. Just like many of you won't buy 2 or more handguns in 5 days. At this stage it isn't worded that ammo will be restricted, just that large purchases be reported. Also that ammo must be purchased at a brick and mortar store just like firearms, which I am not totally opposed to. Think about it, if you are not able to legally purchase a firearm there are ways of getting One through a third party, on the streets, black market- call it what you want. Purchasing ammo online makes it easier for these guys to load those weapons and cause harm. Maybe if ammo sales are restricted to real store fronts it may cut down on some of that action. Guns are useless without bullets.
I thought this might be the whole idea of this administration. Aurora played quite well into their hands. Start talking restricting ammo sales = Back door gun control. I'm flabbergasted that the federal government hasn't started pressuring states to institute some kind of outrageous "luxury tax" on gun/ammo sales, in the same manner as cigarette and liquor sales.45Carrier wrote:I can imagine if such a restriction were to come about, off the shelf prices for ammo would rise 20%(or more) overnight.
http://rockland.lohudblogs.com/2012/08/ ... -internet/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;announced Wednesday that she’s holding a news conference on Thursday to call for immediate restrictions on the sale of ammunition on the Internet.
Mexico restricted citizens to use only low caliber stuff, seems to be working out well right?“Assault weapons and high-caliber ammunition should not be available to the general public
Make 'em go to Wal-Mart?Pat August 8th, 2012 at 3:44 pm
“Assault weapons and high-caliber ammunition should not be available to the general public”
Mexico restricted the “general Public” to only having small caliber guns like a .32 or .380 so only the military, police and cartels who get the military and police guns can use the hi caliber stuff to massacre the thousands of citizens each year….
I don’t think that’s a solution to a problem because the ammo used in those 2 cited crimes could have been bought at WalMart too.
So, you are just throwing out laws which are similar to making cars harder to buy for everyone in order to stop a drunk guy from driving.
Idiocy.