Re: deputies seize Zimmerman's "stockpile"
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:58 pm
100 rounds doesn't even cover one average trip to the range for one caliber for me....Stockpile indeed. 

The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Those cases are pretty easy to isolate. If I punch someone, their skin is not the only skin with injuries.K.Mooneyham wrote:gigag04 wrote:InjuriesBeiruty wrote:In she/he said case, who is considered a proof if there is no witnesses or video/Audio recording?texanjoker wrote:If he receives a DV conviction it won't matter what state he lives in because he won't be legally eligible to own a firearm.![]()
Of course we'll have to wait for the trial (assuming their is one) but haven't there been cases where women injured themselves to get their way in a domestic dispute? Not saying that GZ didn't lose it and act the fool in this case, just that we don't know for certain. Lots of bad stuff swirling around this whole thing.
http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/12/ge ... more-72840" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;I, Samantha Scheibe do hereby swear that the following is true and accurate:
1. On November 18,2013, I called 911 during an argument with my boyfriend, George Zimmerman.
2. We were arguing over personal matters, and I was very overwhelmed and upset at the time.
3. When I was being questioned by the police I felt very intimidated. I was not allowed to call an attorney nor was I allowed to eat or drink anything for a very longtime. I believe that the police misinterpreted me and that I may have misspoken about certain facts in my statement to the police. I do not feel that the arrest report accurately recounts what happened.
4. There were guns in the residence that belonged to George and a gun that belongs to me.
5. During the argument, George and I exchanged words l.u. the heat of the moment and we were in very close proximity in a relatively small room. George never pointed a gun at or toward my face in a threatening manner.
6. I want to be with George. I contacted George’s attorney to ask if there was any way that the stay away order can be lifted so that we can talk and be together. I am not afraid of George any manner and I want to be with him.
7. I do not want George Zimmerman charged. I make this decision freely, knowingly and voluntarily, without any intimidation coercion or undue influences. Neither George Zimmerman nor anyone on his behalf bas threatened me or coerced me or subjected me to any undue influences.
Further, I request that the Seminole County State Attorney’s Office not be allowed to harass me because I do not wish to take part in any prosecution.
I thought it was "Run Forest, RUN!"suthdj wrote:remember "Run Bambi run" just replace Bambi with George.
Legal Insurrection noted that she had been trying to shop an interview with a tabloid even before this alleged incident. Hmmm. Prosecutions can be abusive too...if I could just think of an example...gigag04 wrote:The state can still prosecute if they decide to do so to protect the victim. A change of heart in abusive relationships is pretty common after it cools down, until she burns the cookies again.
Forrestsjfcontrol wrote:I thought it was "Run Forest, RUN!"suthdj wrote:remember "Run Bambi run" just replace Bambi with George.
typppo...WildBill wrote:Forrestsjfcontrol wrote:I thought it was "Run Forest, RUN!"suthdj wrote:remember "Run Bambi run" just replace Bambi with George.
They sure could, but I wonder how difficult it would be without a witness. Or that they already have her lying when, IIRC, she told them she was pregnant on the 911 call. The defense would surely call her as a witness if it got that far and she still wanted him.gigag04 wrote:The state can still prosecute if they decide to do so to protect the victim. A change of heart in abusive relationships is pretty common after it cools down, until she burns the cookies again.
gigag04 wrote:For the record I don't care what the DA does with the case. I think Zimmerman looks more and more like a thug the more time goes on. Maybe I'm just jumping to conclusions but that's a lot of negative run ins with the cops. At some point there needs to be changes made in one's decision making process.
Interesting. Two LEOs agree to the thug label.texanjoker wrote:gigag04 wrote:For the record I don't care what the DA does with the case. I think Zimmerman looks more and more like a thug the more time goes on. Maybe I'm just jumping to conclusions but that's a lot of negative run ins with the cops. At some point there needs to be changes made in one's decision making process.
Right on.gigag04 wrote:A female victim recanting an accusation that she earlier leveled against an alleged aggressor does not in my way decrease the likelihood that crime occurred to me.
Two different female victims is critically alarming.
The added extra behavior is pretty damning in my mind.
I'm not sure what you're looking for in aggressive criminals but roughing up women is high on my list. I know it can be interesting that two LEOs are thinking he's a thug. I was going to post that he is a different word ut the forum edits it to "thug." We're not always right. Just see typical behavior a lot. (Or did see...)
The stress argument doesn't hold water to me in his case. He hasn't been in combat getting blown up. I've served and entered a few high stress situations as an LEO side by side with guys that were blown up in the sandbox and mountains. PTSD is real but I don't think he gets a pass. I may be jaded though so take what I say with a grain of salt.