TexasCHLforum.com

https://www.mediaite.com/news/listen-ad ... lic-trust/

Bribery will be the impeachment charge.

Public impeachment hearings start soon.

None of the Republican witnesses will be heard.

Whistleblower will not testify.

philip964 wrote: Tue Nov 12, 2019 9:00 pm https://www.mediaite.com/news/listen-ad ... lic-trust/

Bribery will be the impeachment charge.

Public impeachment hearings start soon.

None of the Republican witnesses will be heard.

Whistleblower will not testify.

Just wait till you’re accused of something. And can’t have any witnesses to justify your defense.

Can you imagine the people that Schiff must have railroaded when he was a prosecutor? The man seems to have no conscience.

https://politicodailynews.com/sr-admin- ... 7jQq714qpY

Has to do with the dates of the call and the date of the hold on Ukrainian aid. Shows no quid pro quo, now called bribery.

Source is very pro Trump biased as opposed to very anti Trump MSM.

https://news.yahoo.com/could-president- ... 43831.html

Trump could be removed from office and also another vote Senate could make him unable to run for the office again.

https://apnews.com/468e0bcb51e74822a1f8cc11627a1c0d

impeachment inquiry live on TV right now.

First day of Trump Impeachment inquiry a nothing burger. All second hand gossip.

Second day starts now and it is live. Fired Obama appointee is now complaining she was fired.

But now we have a new whistle blower. An immigration official says Trumps immigration policies are immoral.

https://news.yahoo.com/immigration-offi ... 02774.html

https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-att ... g-hearing/

Trump tweets in real time against current witness.

He is exactly right Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President.

Suck it up lady, he fired you, he doesn’t need a reason.

philip964 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:15 am https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-att ... g-hearing/

Trump tweets in real time against current witness.

He is exactly right Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President.

Suck it up lady, he fired you, he doesn’t need a reason.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/foxs-bre ... vanovitch/

Apparently Trump tweeting as the "witness" spoke in the hearing amounts to intimidation of the witness, which someone is saying is impeachable.

In other news Trumps long time friend and advisor, Roger Stone, was convicted of lying to congress, etc. and now faces 50 years in federal prison (no parole).

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... s-n1082326

Interesting, other than Wiener, no Obama people go to jail. Just Trump people. Trump people say the wrong thing. Obama people do things that cause rape injury and death.

philip964 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:10 pm

philip964 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:15 am https://www.mediaite.com/news/trump-att ... g-hearing/

Trump tweets in real time against current witness.

He is exactly right Ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the President.

Suck it up lady, he fired you, he doesn’t need a reason.

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/foxs-bre ... vanovitch/

Apparently Trump tweeting as the "witness" spoke in the hearing amounts to intimidation of the witness, which someone is saying is impeachable.

In other news Trumps long time friend and advisor, Roger Stone, was convicted of lying to congress, etc. and now faces 50 years in federal prison (no parole).

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... s-n1082326

Interesting, other than Wiener, no Obama people go to jail. Just Trump people. Trump people say the wrong thing. Obama people do things that cause rape injury and death.

Trump came down with a cold and could have passed it to a homeless person as the motorcade drove by. Democrats state that it is an impeachable offense. This that I just wrote down makes as much sense as the railroading going on right now. This only solidifies my absolute support for President Trump and his family.

Former Ambassador per Boston Globe:

Marie Yovanovitch said she was presenting a posthumous award to an anti-corruption activist who died after an acid attack the day she was asked to leave her position as ambassador to Ukraine.

It’s impeachible if Trump ordered an acid attack on this poor Ukraine woman. Oh the humanity.

I think she said she was unaware Biden bragged on TV that he got a Ukraine prosecutor fired after threatening to withhold a billion in aid.

I think the prosecutor was looking into corruption in the Ukraine.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ousted ... fends-role

Republican council asks questions, hmmm. Reads like a spy novel.

How can a "tweet" intimidate a witness in real time? Does she have Google glasses to see the tweets while she is answering questions?

striker55 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:44 pm How can a "tweet" intimidate a witness in real time? Does she have Google glasses to see the tweets while she is answering questions?

I think Chairman Schiff read them to her during the hearing, so she could be intimidated.

philip964 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:00 pm

striker55 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:44 pm How can a "tweet" intimidate a witness in real time? Does she have Google glasses to see the tweets while she is answering questions?

I think Chairman Schiff read them to her during the hearing, so she could be intimidated.

My thoughts exactly- and schiff did the intimidating- purposefully, so that he could add another bogus log on the fire if she took the bait.

flechero wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:17 pm

philip964 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:00 pm

striker55 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2019 3:44 pm How can a "tweet" intimidate a witness in real time? Does she have Google glasses to see the tweets while she is answering questions?

I think Chairman Schiff read them to her during the hearing, so she could be intimidated.

My thoughts exactly- and schiff did the intimidating- purposefully, so that he could add another bogus log on the fire if she took the bait.

“However, this whole hearing turned on a dime when the president tweeted about her real-time,” Baier stated.

He said that when Schiff stopped Democratic questioning to read the president’s tweets and get her response, it enabled him to then “characterize that tweet as intimidating the witness or tampering with the witness, which is a crime.”

So doesn’t Schiff become the intimiadator of a witness, if he reads something that the witness would have not normally knew about until after she testified, while she is testifying.