Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:25 am
Some of us notice these subtle put-downs.... trite little box.
- Jim
- Jim
TexasCHLforum.com
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
Hmmmm, on the beach?
Page 4 of 4
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:38 am
I never addressed you specifically, Jim. I am not trying to start a war over a matter of differing opinions, you are certainly entitled to your views and I have no evidence that you are disrespectful in your posts or replies. Don't want a war over semantics, either. If one suggests that a person could responding irrationally to unrealistic situations, I deduce that they could be suggesting that the person may be acting 'silly.' I choose to carry at the beach, perhaps you do not, I respect your decision either way. I would think that others would respond with the same respectful ambiguity pertaining to such personal choices.
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:01 am
I do carry at the beach, and I said why.surferdaddy wrote:I choose to carry at the beach, perhaps you do not,
Peace, dude.
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:12 am
Right on bro. I just hope that, at least in my case, .380 is enough for Jaws. 
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:30 am
Jim, I'm not sure why you're taking offense to what I said. There's no subtle put-down there. The stereotype that dogmatic carriers live in "rusty trailer in Idaho surrounded by rolls of barbed wire and 'no trespassing' signs" is trite. I don't have a dog in this hunt as I don't fall into that category, so I don't even know why I'm continuing with this post. However, I do know people who refuse to go to or enter a place where they cannot carry, and they get along just fine. It's their choice, and with it comes sacrifices.
No offense intended.
No offense intended.
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:57 am
We've all had our say. Let's go on to the next topic.
- Jim
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:37 pm
Jim's right. This is a 
.
{No one has played the deadhorse smiley lately. }
. {No one has played the deadhorse smiley lately. }
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:56 pm
You should use more than a .380 to put down a horse. Unless it's a seahorse. You also don't have to conceal long guns.Oldgringo wrote:Jim's right. This is a
{No one has played the deadhorse smiley lately. }
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:45 am
Generally my son and I take turns to sit the water out and hold on to it while the other goes in and has a good time. Seems to work out pretty well. Don’t know what we’ll do once he leaves for the job he’s gotten in Seattle.
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:00 am
NEB wrote:The "statistically safe" argument doesn't stack up. All of us are statistically safe from a shooting. All of us are statistically safe from a shark bite or lightening strike. Heck, all of us are statistically safe from winning the lottery. However, all of these things happen to people regularly who were just as statistically safe as we are.
I wonder how many millions of people visited Luby's restaurants without incident before 23 people lost their lives to one psycho one afternoon in 1991?
That being said, there are just some times that you have to make a choice about carry. That choice is an individual choice, and each person approaches it differently. If I've had a hard week and want to go out to a restaurant with my wife and have a drink, I have a choice. I can choose to forgo the drink and carry, or I can leave my pistol at home. Same goes for the beach or anywhere else where carrying would be a hindrance to an activity. You either don't do the activity, you find a way to do the activity while carrying, or you don't carry.
WELL SAID ! If your are comfortable with statistics, then why carry at all
Here are some stats : http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Galve ... nity-info/
Humm, violent crimes 0.44% of Galveston County..
Ok, Don't carry... BUT IF your in that 0.44% you would have wish you was carrying..
BAT
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:17 am
Those who want to live like they were in a war zone are free to do so. However, civil law dictates the rules of engagement.
Can we just let this thread die?
- Jim
Can we just let this thread die?
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:43 am
I thought we should too, Jim. However, there are things that go bump in the night and boogie men/women lurking in the parking lots and fillin' stations as well as behind the non-compliant signs. In fact, evildoers and scofflaws are everywhere. We must be ever vigilant and prepared to defend ourselves at all times and in all places.seamusTX wrote:Those who want to live like they were in a war zone are free to do so. However, civil law dictates the rules of engagement.
Can we just let this thread die?
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Speaking of new threads....I would love to hear from some CHL holders on this forum that have actually invoked thier right to carry in defending themselves or thier families...not the what if's..and the what should haves..and what would YOU do's....but lets hear from some actual folks that HAVE gotten jacked in the parking lot and had to draw..or some other similar scenario..
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:21 pm
It was more subtle than the "rusty trailer in Idaho" put-down. That's for sure.seamusTX wrote:Some of us notice these subtle put-downs.... trite little box.
- Jim
Re: Hmmmm, on the beach?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:18 pm
Hasn't this thread run its course? Enough with the nanh na nanh na doo doo.
Everybody go worry about a sign or the Post Office or Las Vegas or something...please.
Everybody go worry about a sign or the Post Office or Las Vegas or something...please.