TexasCHLforum.com

I'm sorry, because I probably should know, but what is "OCDO"?

Open Carry Dot Org

Thank you! Like I said, I should have been able to figure that out! Guess I'm a little slow today!

birdman253 wrote:Thank you! Like I said, I should have been able to figure that out! Guess I'm a little slow today!

You're not alone.

steveincowtown wrote:

TXBO wrote:Here's another direct quote of Perry from the same article:

In his interview Thursday, Perry also said gun owners should be "appropriately backgrounded, appropriately vetted, appropriately trained."

"We license people to drive on our highways,” he said. “We give them that privilege. The same is true with our concealed handguns.”


Sounds like talking points right out of the liberal handbook.

Following this logic here we should also register guns, after all cars are registered. There is also no "right to drive" enumerated in the constitution.

.

Car's don't have to be registered, unless they are used on public roadways.

That puts the silly car vs gun registration analogy to bed. GOD bless Texas!

JKTex wrote:

steveincowtown wrote:

TXBO wrote:Here's another direct quote of Perry from the same article:

In his interview Thursday, Perry also said gun owners should be "appropriately backgrounded, appropriately vetted, appropriately trained."

"We license people to drive on our highways,” he said. “We give them that privilege. The same is true with our concealed handguns.”


Sounds like talking points right out of the liberal handbook.

Following this logic here we should also register guns, after all cars are registered. There is also no "right to drive" enumerated in the constitution.

.

Car's don't have to be registered, unless they are used on public roadways.

That puts the silly car vs gun registration analogy to bed. GOD bless Texas!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
The topic of this thread is civil discourse and debate, not the merits of licensed or unlicensed open-carry. I have to admit that I expected some folks to come to the defense of OCT and Grisham.

Chas.

I abandon this thread long ago out of respect.

steveincowtown wrote:

JKTex wrote:

steveincowtown wrote:

TXBO wrote:Here's another direct quote of Perry from the same article:

In his interview Thursday, Perry also said gun owners should be "appropriately backgrounded, appropriately vetted, appropriately trained."

"We license people to drive on our highways,” he said. “We give them that privilege. The same is true with our concealed handguns.”


Sounds like talking points right out of the liberal handbook.

Following this logic here we should also register guns, after all cars are registered. There is also no "right to drive" enumerated in the constitution.

.

Car's don't have to be registered, unless they are used on public roadways.

That puts the silly car vs gun registration analogy to bed. GOD bless Texas!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
The topic of this thread is civil discourse and debate, not the merits of licensed or unlicensed open-carry. I have to admit that I expected some folks to come to the defense of OCT and Grisham.

Chas.

I abandon this thread long ago out of respect.

I gave up also.

Chas.

[quote="Charles L. Cotton] I gave up also.

Chas.[/quote]

Limiting the discussion to the topic of civil discourse really leaves little dissent for most reasonable adults. What's left to say?

I believe this is as good as any place for this.

The idiots continue to press on with their stupid counter-productive actions and rhetoric. It's imperative we do all we can to separate ourselves from these lunatics. The best way to do so is to be respectful and as well spoken as possible by avoiding ridiculous hyperbole and threats when interacting with those that hold the fate of our cause in their hands.