TexasCHLforum.com

C-dub wrote: Then I guess this university should ask for their money back since it only applies to Congress. Or the woman that needed some muscle to help violate it that has been fired.

Oops. I forgot to include a link I had.

http://dailytrojan.com/2015/11/18/firin ... ic-speech/

The university was held liable for violating free speech.

C-dub wrote:

C-dub wrote: Then I guess this university should ask for their money back since it only applies to Congress. Or the woman that needed some muscle to help violate it that has been fired.

Oops. I forgot to include a link I had.

http://dailytrojan.com/2015/11/18/firin ... ic-speech/

The university was held liable for violating free speech.

Incorrect. It was held liable for termination without cause.

chamberc wrote:

C-dub wrote:

C-dub wrote: Then I guess this university should ask for their money back since it only applies to Congress. Or the woman that needed some muscle to help violate it that has been fired.

Oops. I forgot to include a link I had.

http://dailytrojan.com/2015/11/18/firin ... ic-speech/

The university was held liable for violating free speech.

Incorrect. It was held liable for termination without cause.

Isn't that what it's called in a non-right to work state?

Just change the way you advertise and market....

When I think of buying or selling, Facebook never entered my mind.

cyphertext wrote:Just change the way you advertise and market....

I have very negative thoughts about such as this. To me it is not much different than the City of Ft. Worth skating around the law by requiring wristbands.

mojo84 wrote:

cyphertext wrote:Just change the way you advertise and market....

I have very negative thoughts about such as this. To me it is not much different than the City of Ft. Worth skating around the law by requiring wristbands.

Big difference between a city government trying to impose restrictions against legal carry and skating a private entities policies on a virtual website. Not to mention that it was obviously a joke.

Nice find LSUTiger !

cyphertext wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

cyphertext wrote:Just change the way you advertise and market....

I have very negative thoughts about such as this. To me it is not much different than the City of Ft. Worth skating around the law by requiring wristbands.

Big difference between a city government trying to impose restrictions against legal carry and skating a private entities policies on a virtual website. Not to mention that it was obviously a joke.

The problem is, the mental midgets on the facebook page where I saw that are the type to try some such tactic.

While the government skating the law is bad, it does not make such tactics any more honorable.