Re: SB11 Campus Carry House Floor Debate 5/26/15
Posted: Tue May 26, 2015 11:02 pm
More clock running...
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://www.texaschlforum.com/
correct. right along with Cinderella's carriage.Ruark wrote:So you're saying that if there are, say, 110 amendments, and at midnight they're only at amendment 37, SB11 dies right then and there....?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yep, that's what is going to happen.cprems wrote:Mr. Cotton, I really appreciate your updates and all the hard work but unless these amendments stop before midnight and there is a vote, this is just dressing.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
They're going to run out the clock.
Chas.
Wording on a committee report.Jasonw560 wrote:Joined just as soon as someone decided to make a POO. What's it on?
Opposition brought up a perceived discrepancy between the bill analysis and bill language.Jasonw560 wrote:Joined just as soon as someone decided to make a POO. What's it on?
verbiage in the bill analysis vs the bill about "campus" vs "premises".Jasonw560 wrote:Joined just as soon as someone decided to make a POO. What's it on?
Yep.I can hear him now: "Well, I brought it up for a vote. I can't control how many amendments are brought up. Not my fault it died".Right2Carry wrote:Looks like Straus will get the last laugh.............again. Stupid low information voters!
Pockets run deep.mojo84 wrote:I've said it before and I think we are seeing it in action, I don't think campus carry has a snowball's chance as long as Straus is speaker. His ties to UT leadership and contractors that benefit from work at UT run too deep.
I believe they tried something similar earlier. I don't think they have the votes anyway.jerry_r60 wrote:I heard Straus say midnight is midnight. So no chance to suspend the rule and extend the time? Are there not enough votes to do that? I assume that's a 3/4 vote.
One vote to suspend rules already failed today. Aint happenin.jerry_r60 wrote:I heard Straus say midnight is midnight. So no chance to suspend the rule and extend the time? Are there not enough votes to do that? I assume that's a 3/4 vote.
I think that was Kuempel, not Straus.jerry_r60 wrote:I heard Straus say midnight is midnight. So no chance to suspend the rule and extend the time? Are there not enough votes to do that? I assume that's a 3/4 vote.