Page 5 of 5

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:09 pm
by Pawpaw
Soccerdad1995 wrote:I'm thinking of filing a false / misleading advertising complaint with the AG given that this new Dallas Amusement park is using the name "zoo" in their title, when they are, in fact merely a low end amusement park. Probably wouldn't get far but might be interesting to see the response.
I wonder about their contract. Did the city of Dallas contract with the management company to run a zoo or an amusement park?

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:19 pm
by Bashful
I don't know if it's been posted yet... but here's Paxton's web site which has the 30.06 ruling letters sent from his office.

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/30 ... ng-letters

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:09 am
by doncb
If I understood the news last night, Dallas is negotiating with the same management company that runs the Dallas zoo to run Fair Park. If they do you can rest assured that signs WILL go up.

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 5:15 pm
by Soccerdad1995
After thinking this through, there is a fairly concerning precedent here. What is to stop any large City from putting a few small rides on any plot of 75 acres or more and calling it an amusement park?

In substance these would clearly not be amusement parks, but then neither is the Dallas zoo. They clearly market themselves as a zoo, not an amusement park.

This may require a legislative solution. Simple fix, just eliminate the amusement park loophole entirely, along with the day care and educational institution loopholes.

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:00 pm
by Lynyrd
Maybe, just maybe, if you could crawl deep inside the mind of the decision makers at the Dallas Zoo you might find that they are worried that somehow an animal might be killed. I know this is a stretch, but they don't think like we do.

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 7:01 pm
by ScottDLS
Soccerdad1995 wrote:After thinking this through, there is a fairly concerning precedent here. What is to stop any large City from putting a few small rides on any plot of 75 acres or more and calling it an amusement park?

In substance these would clearly not be amusement parks, but then neither is the Dallas zoo. They clearly market themselves as a zoo, not an amusement park.

This may require a legislative solution. Simple fix, just eliminate the amusement park loophole entirely, along with the day care and educational institution loopholes.
There is no day care loophole...

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:00 am
by Rrash
The monorail isn't open 120 days a year because it keeps breaking down.

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 11:26 am
by truckster
TreyHouston wrote:This is very discouraging. I im not afraid of the monkies attacking i mainly carry for the parking lot adventure. A few months ago a terrorist was arested in houston, he was planning to blow up the galeria. Now, i would think that in a large public place that more people that could stop a guy with a bomb would be a good thing.
I am NOT looking forward to the day we can say, "I told you"!
How are you going to stop a guy with a bomb? Usually people planting bombs for terroristic intentions don't advertise that they're carrying or planting one. I understand the point you're trying to get across but you used a very poor example to do so.

Good day

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:48 pm
by Pawpaw
truckster wrote:How are you going to stop a guy with a bomb? Usually people planting bombs for terroristic intentions don't advertise that they're carrying or planting one. I understand the point you're trying to get across but you used a very poor example to do so.
There are examples of it happening:
Friday February 22, 2002

Alert customer shoots terrorist in Efrat supermarket

By The Jerusalem Post Internet Staff

An alert customer shot dead a terrorist who tried to set off an
explosive device in a supermarket a few minutes ago in Efrat. The town
is in Gush Etzion, a block of Jewish communities in Judea, south of
Bethlehem.

At least one small explosion did take place, leaving one customer
lightly wounded but causing no casualties, said Jerusalem Post reporter
Margot Dudkevitch. Nails from one of the explosions littered the floor.

Further tragedy was averted when a woman shopping in the packed
supermarket apparently saw the terrorist trying to set off a second
explosion and shot him twice in the head from close range.

A police source told Israel Radio the terrorist apparently intended to
detonate a small bomb in the supermarket and then blow himself up with
the explosive belt when police forces came to the scene.

The terrorist was a Palestinian who had a permit allowing him to work in
Efrat, Israel Radio reported.

Sources in Bethlehem revealed the terrorist was Muhammad Ashimali, 22,
from the village Adoha, south of Bethlehem.

Ashimali wanted to be a martyr, his father said.
The circumstances of the attack are still being investigated.

- See more at: http://www.wagc.com/woman-in-israel-gun ... fDikA.dpuf
http://www.wagc.com/woman-in-israel-gun ... -02-22-02/

Re: Dallas Zoo’s gun ban found to be legal by Texas AG

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:18 pm
by TreyHouston
Pawpaw wrote:
truckster wrote:How are you going to stop a guy with a bomb? Usually people planting bombs for terroristic intentions don't advertise that they're carrying or planting one. I understand the point you're trying to get across but you used a very poor example to do so.
There are examples of it happening:
Friday February 22, 2002

Alert customer shoots terrorist in Efrat supermarket

By The Jerusalem Post Internet Staff

An alert customer shot dead a terrorist who tried to set off an
explosive device in a supermarket a few minutes ago in Efrat. The town
is in Gush Etzion, a block of Jewish communities in Judea, south of
Bethlehem.

At least one small explosion did take place, leaving one customer
lightly wounded but causing no casualties, said Jerusalem Post reporter
Margot Dudkevitch. Nails from one of the explosions littered the floor.

Further tragedy was averted when a woman shopping in the packed
supermarket apparently saw the terrorist trying to set off a second
explosion and shot him twice in the head from close range.

A police source told Israel Radio the terrorist apparently intended to
detonate a small bomb in the supermarket and then blow himself up with
the explosive belt when police forces came to the scene.

The terrorist was a Palestinian who had a permit allowing him to work in
Efrat, Israel Radio reported.

Sources in Bethlehem revealed the terrorist was Muhammad Ashimali, 22,
from the village Adoha, south of Bethlehem.

Ashimali wanted to be a martyr, his father said.
The circumstances of the attack are still being investigated.

- See more at: http://www.wagc.com/woman-in-israel-gun ... fDikA.dpuf
http://www.wagc.com/woman-in-israel-gun ... -02-22-02/


Thanks for getting my back! In the military i was always told infantry can never take out a tank! My team took out 3 for this great nation! Never underestimate persons ability.