TexasCHLforum.com

nobius wrote:Can the amendments be removed at third reading using another amendment?

jerry_r60 wrote:It's in amendment one. The amendment removed language so you have to go back to the original bill and see the text that is removed by the amendment.

jerry_r60 wrote:

TexasJohnBoy wrote:

TexasJohnBoy wrote:For those curious:

https://twitter.com/MorganSmith/status/ ... 5839986688" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stickland is on there, yall... Just sayin.

Yes, and I didn't hear him yesterday shooting us in the foot so i'll give him credit for that. It will be nice if he learns from this session and gets better.

RoyGBiv wrote:

jerry_r60 wrote:It's in amendment one. The amendment removed language so you have to go back to the original bill and see the text that is removed by the amendment.

Do you have a link for the text of the Zerwas Amendment (#1)?
My recollection of the debate last night was that private colleges were left unchanged. There was discussion about "if it's good for public colleges then why not private?", but the House member pushing that argument was doing it as a Bill killer and, ultimately, there was nothing added or deleted last night that affects private colleges.... I'd like to see the text of the Amendment to confirm this...

And...

Just to reset..... Only one amendment was added to SB 11. All other proposed amendments failed.
You can confirm this by checking the Record Votes dated yesterday here: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup ... &Bill=SB11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Amendment 2 (amending Amendment 1) failed, Amendment 1 passed, Amendment 3 was withdrawn, Amendment 4 failed, SB11 passed on second reading.

RoyGBiv wrote:

jerry_r60 wrote:It's in amendment one. The amendment removed language so you have to go back to the original bill and see the text that is removed by the amendment.

Do you have a link for the text of the Zerwas Amendment (#1)?

edited.

safety1 wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:

jerry_r60 wrote:It's in amendment one. The amendment removed language so you have to go back to the original bill and see the text that is removed by the amendment.

Do you have a link for the text of the Zerwas Amendment (#1)?
My recollection of the debate last night was that private colleges were left unchanged. There was discussion about "if it's good for public colleges then why not private?", but the House member pushing that argument was doing it as a Bill killer and, ultimately, there was nothing added or deleted last night that affects private colleges.... I'd like to see the text of the Amendment to confirm this...

And...

Just to reset..... Only one amendment was added to SB 11. All other proposed amendments failed.
You can confirm this by checking the Record Votes dated yesterday here: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup ... &Bill=SB11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Amendment 2 (amending Amendment 1) failed, Amendment 1 passed, Amendment 3 was withdrawn, Amendment 4 failed, SB11 passed on second reading.

Wasn't their a latter amendment that was acceptable to the author that was attached without a vote?

RoyGBiv wrote: ...
Do you have a link for the text of the Zerwas Amendment (#1)?

RoyGBiv wrote: And...

Just to reset..... Only one amendment was added to SB 11. All other proposed amendments failed.
You can confirm this by checking the Record Votes dated yesterday here: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup ... &Bill=SB11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Amendment 2 (amending Amendment 1) failed, Amendment 1 passed, Amendment 3 was withdrawn, Amendment 4 failed, SB11 passed on second reading.

DocV wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote: ...
Do you have a link for the text of the Zerwas Amendment (#1)?

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/84 ... 011H21.PDF

RoyGBiv wrote:2 more were added without a record vote.

(e) A private or independent institution of higher
education in this state, after consulting with students, staff, and
faculty of the institution, may establish rules, regulations, or
other provisions prohibiting license holders from carrying
handguns on premises that are owned or leased and operated by the
institution and located on the campus of the institution.

RoyGBiv wrote:Reading Amendment 6... Looks like it changed the bill from "private colleges are still prohibited" to "private colleges can opt out".
I don't have a lot of grief about that, assuming I'm reading it correctly. Probably why it passed without a record vote.

Maybe I'm not reading it correctly?

Here's 411.2031(e): http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/83 ... 00182I.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(e) A private or independent institution of higher
education in this state, after consulting with students, staff, and
faculty of the institution, may establish rules, regulations, or
other provisions prohibiting license holders from carrying
handguns on premises that are owned or leased and operated by the
institution and located on the campus of the institution.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:Reading Amendment 6... Looks like it changed the bill from "private colleges are still prohibited" to "private colleges can opt out".
I don't have a lot of grief about that, assuming I'm reading it correctly. Probably why it passed without a record vote.

Maybe I'm not reading it correctly?

Here's 411.2031(e): http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/83 ... 00182I.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

(e) A private or independent institution of higher
education in this state, after consulting with students, staff, and
faculty of the institution, may establish rules, regulations, or
other provisions prohibiting license holders from carrying
handguns on premises that are owned or leased and operated by the
institution and located on the campus of the institution.

I wonder if the part about "after consulting with students, staff, and faculty..." has any teeth in it. Will students actually get a say? Will staff actually get a say? Or will libtard faculty have all the clout?