TexasCHLforum.com

03Lightningrocks wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:your best chance of survival in my mind, would be with the gun the shooter is MOST accurate with.

I assume you meant most so I changed it to keep others from getting confused.

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was referring to which round YOU would rather be shot with, in which case, which ever the shooter is least accurate with is a valid answer.

bigred90gt wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:your best chance of survival in my mind, would be with the gun the shooter is MOST accurate with.

I assume you meant most so I changed it to keep others from getting confused.

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was referring to which round YOU would rather be shot with, in which case, which ever the shooter is least accurate with is a valid answer.

That it was I was goign for, in my mind some one who aims for and hits a vital area with anything .380 or larger is most likely going to kill you

zero4o3 wrote:

bigred90gt wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:your best chance of survival in my mind, would be with the gun the shooter is MOST accurate with.

I assume you meant most so I changed it to keep others from getting confused.

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was referring to which round YOU would rather be shot with, in which case, which ever the shooter is least accurate with is a valid answer.

That it was I was goign for, in my mind some one who aims for and hits a vital area with anything .380 or larger is most likely going to kill you

It's true that a solid hit with a .380 or larger round in a vital area will likely result in an end to the threat.
How quickly or slowly that happens will make or break the defender's day.

There's a significant difference between "pretty quick" and "eventually" in that result. The size and power of the round has a pretty big influence on the time it takes to achieve useful effect when the shootee really wants to keep doing what he was doing that made it necessary to shoot him.

When it comes to bullets, little and light doesn't do the same job as big and heavy.

Remember that whatever you choose will be all you have to work with in a moment of need.

Choose carefully.

Excaliber wrote:When it comes to bullets, little and light doesn't do the same job as big and heavy.

I would only amend that to say "when it comes to handgun bullets..." because I sure as heck wouldn't want to get shot by someone wielding an AR15.

zero4o3 wrote:

bigred90gt wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:

zero4o3 wrote:your best chance of survival in my mind, would be with the gun the shooter is MOST accurate with.

I assume you meant most so I changed it to keep others from getting confused.

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was referring to which round YOU would rather be shot with, in which case, which ever the shooter is least accurate with is a valid answer.

That it was I was goign for, in my mind some one who aims for and hits a vital area with anything .380 or larger is most likely going to kill you

LOL... I get it now. So who's on first?

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Excaliber wrote:When it comes to bullets, little and light doesn't do the same job as big and heavy.

I would only amend that to say "when it comes to handgun bullets..." because I sure as heck wouldn't want to get shot by someone wielding an AR15.

Given your 'druthers', what would you 'druther' get shot with?

Oldgringo wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Excaliber wrote:When it comes to bullets, little and light doesn't do the same job as big and heavy.

I would only amend that to say "when it comes to handgun bullets..." because I sure as heck wouldn't want to get shot by someone wielding an AR15.

Given your 'druthers', what would you 'druther' get shot with?

Marshmallows



http://www.marshmallowville.com/

Reeses peanut butter cup gun?

Just my $.02. I carried a PPK/S for many years before I got my CW9. I'm a fairly small-framed guy, and it was no sweat to conceal. Rarely felt as if I wasn't carrying "enough" gun. Mostly, some gun is better than no gun.

bugsbunny45 wrote:I was just on another site and they state they would delete any discussions that promote a Mouse gun or 380 as a CCW choice.

That makes as much sense to me as a car repair website deleting any discussions involving metric wrenches.

J.R.@A&M wrote:

bugsbunny45 wrote:I was just on another site and they state they would delete any discussions that promote a Mouse gun or 380 as a CCW choice.

That makes as much sense to me as a car repair website deleting any discussions involving metric wrenches.

Took my old VW bug to a local garage once for an easy repair and when I got it back I noticed the heads of several bolts were rounded off.

IMO, the only ccw that should be discouraged, is the one that you won't carry.... big or small.

can someone PM me the names of these websites? Just want see it for myself

Texas_Tactical wrote:can someone PM me the names of these websites? Just want see it for myself

I wouldn't mind knowing the web sight names. Maybe post em up?

Thanks to the ones that sent me it.

I don't see a problem with it. this is not a bashing thread.