TexasCHLforum.com

Why doesn't the FBI raid this place?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510218,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wouldn't a Muslims only rule violate the same federal housing laws as a Whites only rule?

wheelgun1958 wrote:Why doesn't the FBI raid this place?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510218,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You reckon the POTUS' religious convictions have anything to do with the FBI's directions?

We'll have none of those counterrevolutionary thoughts here!

bayouhazard wrote:Wouldn't a Muslims only rule violate the same federal housing laws as a Whites only rule?

I sure would think so, but maybe anyone can form their own town and the rules are different?

Regardless, I am sure that the FBI is keeping an eye on them........ at, least, I sure hope so.

Is it because big O is an aetheist muslim sympathizer (sh.....)? Nothing wrong with being Muslim or Aetheist, but aetheists do not believe in a supreme divine being. They believe that the supreme power is the government. In other words, the government takes the place of God. Aetheists are by nature, state-ists. Nothing wrong with being muslim as most muslims are Asian. There are more muslims in china than all of the middle eastern countries. there are more muslims in Indonesia than all of the middle eastern countries. The crazy anti-american fundmentalists in the middle east are a small minority of muslims. He also arguably has dual citizenship. Nothing wrong with that either, but it does make one wonder about his loyalties toward America....

I think one of us should try to buy a house in that community and when denied, sue 'em. Discrimination is wrong, whether it is reverse discrimination or any other type of discrimination.

Du meinst sicher "Burg" und nicht "Berg"
unless Mohammed went to the mountain.

drjoker wrote:Discrimination is wrong, whether it is reverse discrimination or any other type of discrimination.

I don't believe in reverse discrimination. Discrimination is discrimination no matter which way it flows. If we call it by another name the libs will justify one and not the other.

SkydiverRick wrote:

drjoker wrote:Discrimination is wrong, whether it is reverse discrimination or any other type of discrimination.

I don't believe in reverse discrimination. Discrimination is discrimination no matter which way it flows. If we call it by another name the libs will justify one and not the other.

SkydiverRick wrote:

drjoker wrote:Discrimination is wrong, whether it is reverse discrimination or any other type of discrimination.

I don't believe in reverse discrimination. Discrimination is discrimination no matter which way it flows. If we call it by another name the libs will justify one and not the other.

+1

drjoker wrote:... aetheists do not believe in a supreme divine being. They believe that the supreme power is the government. In other words, the government takes the place of God. Aetheists are by nature, state-ists.

As one of your local dreaded atheists I can assure you that I have not replaced any supreme divine being with any supreme divine government, or even a secular government.

SwimFan85 wrote:Du meinst sicher "Burg" und nicht "Berg"
unless Mohammed went to the mountain.

Ließen Sie den Artikel, Sie lesen würden wissen, dass sie ihn Berg buchstabierten. Ich erwarte nicht die Bewohner, intelligent zu sein genug, ihren Fehler zu verstehen.

Mo's intelligence precedes him.

PSLOwner wrote:

bayouhazard wrote:Wouldn't a Muslims only rule violate the same federal housing laws as a Whites only rule?

I sure would think so, but maybe anyone can form their own town and the rules are different?

Regardless, I am sure that the FBI is keeping an eye on them........ at, least, I sure hope so.

Becasue it is a religion not a race thing and there is no law against it.

Based on this article, it appears this place is a privately owned community or compound or village or whatever, not an incorporated township. No different from a Mormon or Amish community (other than their ideologies) which restricts membership.
If there is a known terrorist at the place then they should be watched carefully, but is this terrorist actually there?

edited out a link to the same article I thought was different.

buff wrote:

drjoker wrote:... aetheists do not believe in a supreme divine being. They believe that the supreme power is the government. In other words, the government takes the place of God. Aetheists are by nature, state-ists.

As one of your local dreaded atheists I can assure you that I have not replaced any supreme divine being with any supreme divine government, or even a secular government.

Having grown up an atheist, now a Christian...I would have to agree. Most atheists I knew were libertarian and some anarchists. Now humanism (an atheist is not always a humanist but a humanist is always an atheist) is a different matter and a dangerous world view.