Page 1 of 2

Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 8:41 pm
by VoiceofReason
He should not be fired.

He should be put in jail and the DOJ cleaned out.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:04 pm
by mamabearCali
:iagree: :iagree: :iagree: :mad5

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:13 pm
by Dadtodabone
He's more than welcome to resign, perhaps with the mood of the congress and the citizenry we'll get a AG that will support the constitution. His resignation won't shield him from prosecution should an investigation find him culpable in illegal activity.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:27 pm
by suthdj
Dadtodabone wrote:He's more than welcome to resign, perhaps with the mood of the congress and the citizenry we'll get a AG that will support the constitution. His resignation won't shield him from prosecution should an investigation find him culpable in illegal activity.
Obummer will shield him or should I say pardon him.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:27 pm
by jmra
He needs to go.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:31 pm
by RX8er
jmra wrote:He needs to go.
to jail

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 9:37 pm
by Dadtodabone
suthdj wrote:
Dadtodabone wrote:He's more than welcome to resign, perhaps with the mood of the congress and the citizenry we'll get a AG that will support the constitution. His resignation won't shield him from prosecution should an investigation find him culpable in illegal activity.
Obummer will shield him or should I say pardon him.
That would be true whether he is in office or not. And, if Holder is in a prosecutor's sights what makes you think that Mr. Obama isn't also. Mr. Nixon was unable to provide executive clemency for his close associates who wound up in prison, such could be the case here also.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 10:00 pm
by jmra
RX8er wrote:
jmra wrote:He needs to go.
to jail
Or under it.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 11:58 pm
by locke_n_load
Image

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 8:40 am
by RKirkwood
It is going to take several years to clear out all the crooks in office.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 8:48 am
by Z1166
RKirkwood wrote:It is going to take several years to clear out all the crooks in office.
Funny, I thought we just replaced crooks every few years.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 7:58 pm
by HK_USP_45
Wasn't Holder up to his ears in the Waco killing of those kids and others in that compound?

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:30 am
by RoyGBiv
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05 ... mes-rosen/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Holder Department of Justice went judge shopping with criminal warrants for James Rosen.

Two separate judges refused to offer DOJ the ability to secretly search the contents of Rosen’s e-mail account. A third judge, Royce C. Lamberth, appealed the decision and overturned the order of the two judges.

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:03 am
by Jaguar
Holder's request for an "off-the-record" meeting with the press has been roundly thumped. Only Politico plans to attend the meeting, even the HoPo and NY Times said no.

Liberal water bearers (press) seem to be sloshing the jug after the Justice Dept. started investigating them. :roll:

ETA: source - http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... -on-leaks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Eric Holder should not resign.

Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 10:07 am
by baldeagle
Jaguar wrote:Holder's request for an "off-the-record" meeting with the press has been roundly thumped. Only Politico plans to attend the meeting, even the HoPo and NY Times said no.

Liberal water bearers (press) seem to be sloshing the jug after the Justice Dept. started investigating them. :roll:
And only an idiot couldn't have seen this coming - but then liberals are idiots, so there you go.

It never seems to occur to bozos that if they can get away with murder, so can their opponents. And all it takes is a change of administrations for the hammer to fall on the other side. That's why the rule of law is so important. It protects EVERYONE.