TexasCHLforum.com

Just what we needed next.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/02 ... urope.html

We should just turn Iran into blue glass.

Send them. They will show the true nature of what we're fighting, Unfortunately, there will be a great deal of civilians injured and killed by these savages. And, in certain places, they may get a real down home welcome from their intended victims. If they're smart, they'll go places where reacting to a terrorist situation involves "sheltering in place" because they have and unarmed populace that has a drone mindset.

Jeff B.

Your Taxes at work
#IranDeal
Every bit as good as Bill Clinton's North Korea Deal

Too bad they will try to blend into the populace and not wear their uniforms to make themselves easy targets.

Jeff B. wrote:Send them. They will show the true nature of what we're fighting, Unfortunately, there will be a great deal of civilians injured and killed by these savages. And, in certain places, they may get a real down home welcome from their intended victims. If they're smart, they'll go places where reacting to a terrorist situation involves "sheltering in place" because they have and unarmed populace that has a drone mindset.

Jeff B.

So you assume this will cause the government to question who we let into the country?? So by that logic wouldn't they move to ban guns if that's what is used? You forget Clinton will be president soon.

They'd better do their dirty work in liberal cities. Go getting all jihad in most places in Texas, you'll get to those virgins most ricky tick.

AndyC wrote:Sounds like a declaration of war, so let's respond as such

That was my thought when I read this yesterday.

Soap wrote:

Jeff B. wrote:Send them. They will show the true nature of what we're fighting, Unfortunately, there will be a great deal of civilians injured and killed by these savages. And, in certain places, they may get a real down home welcome from their intended victims. If they're smart, they'll go places where reacting to a terrorist situation involves "sheltering in place" because they have and unarmed populace that has a drone mindset.

Jeff B.

So you assume this will cause the government to question who we let into the country?? So by that logic wouldn't they move to ban guns if that's what is used? You forget Clinton will be president soon.

I don't think so.

AndyC wrote:Sounds like a declaration of war, so let's respond as such

In any other point in American history, this would be the case. Under our current Administration we will be asked to use this as an opportunity to be introspective and look inside our own hearts.

Infuriating that our government's appeasement of a terrorist sponsor state has made Iran flush with cash to finance and expand their operations.

Of note, Iran did not threaten Israel. Could that be because of the possible quick military response by the IDF?

allisji wrote:

Soap wrote:

Jeff B. wrote:Send them. They will show the true nature of what we're fighting, Unfortunately, there will be a great deal of civilians injured and killed by these savages. And, in certain places, they may get a real down home welcome from their intended victims. If they're smart, they'll go places where reacting to a terrorist situation involves "sheltering in place" because they have and unarmed populace that has a drone mindset.

Jeff B.

So you assume this will cause the government to question who we let into the country?? So by that logic wouldn't they move to ban guns if that's what is used? You forget Clinton will be president soon.

I don't think so.

I bet you 100 rounds of your favorite ammo.

Soap wrote:

allisji wrote:

Soap wrote:

Jeff B. wrote:Send them. They will show the true nature of what we're fighting, Unfortunately, there will be a great deal of civilians injured and killed by these savages. And, in certain places, they may get a real down home welcome from their intended victims. If they're smart, they'll go places where reacting to a terrorist situation involves "sheltering in place" because they have and unarmed populace that has a drone mindset.

Jeff B.

So you assume this will cause the government to question who we let into the country?? So by that logic wouldn't they move to ban guns if that's what is used? You forget Clinton will be president soon.

I don't think so.

I bet you 100 rounds of your favorite ammo.

I'm not a betting man, but I can't see her winning at this point. Trump has at least pulled even with her. He has all of the momentum. It looks like he's going to hold all of his "must-win" swing states including OH, FL, NC, NV, AZ, IA which puts him on the precipice, then he only needs to win one "blue state" out of CO, PA, NH, NM, MI, MN, WI many of which he's within 1 to 3 points in the polls. Again, he's got momentum and she's got serious FBI issues. It could end up 269-269 if Trump wins NH, then the congress would certainly award him the victory. I don't see how she can steal a victory at this point she's barely staying above water right now.

Soap wrote:
I don't think so.

I bet you 100 rounds of your favorite ammo.[/quote]

I'll take you up! Hornady .223 68 gr match HPBT


In all honesty at this point I've decided to take a positive approach to this crabby election and just assume a donald win. Very well might not work out in my favor, but I'm going to at least fake some confidence.