TexasCHLforum.com

https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/m ... e-country/

Bloomberg says California is a model for the country.

News for Mr. Bloomberg

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevor ... 21feb923a3

My observation: Bloomberg is skipping the traditional way to be a Presidential candidate ? Doesn't debate, skips the Caucas, just paying for TV ads, Am I Right?

crazy2medic wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:53 am My observation: Bloomberg is skipping the traditional way to be a Presidential candidate ? Doesn't debate, skips the Caucas, just paying for TV ads, Am I Right?

Absolutely- this is bad for America but good for him... otherwise he'd be exposed for the fraud he is, by having to answer debate questions, be called out by other candidates on the spot, etc. No real danger in this route... and buying up ad space to intentionally lower other's exposure and run up price (according to his campaign mgr on a radio interview) is both underhanded and brilliant.

He's a snake in the grass, even among dems and socialists!

California is the model for how to destroy a beautiful landscape with homeless encampments, dirty needles, high taxes, high cost to live and people leaving the state.

Bloomberg suffers from cranial-rectal inversion syndrome!

philip964 wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2020 1:00 am https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/m ... e-country/

Bloomberg says California is a model for the country.

Liberal Democrat Socialist policies create exactly that which they campaign against. They accuse GOP of benefiting the rich at the expense of the poor ... and convince enough poor so they get voted in ... to become richer at the expense of the poor ( below quote from https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckdevor ... 98d1a723a3 )

While California has produced a sizable crop of billionaires in the past 20 years, it has also led the nation in poverty. ...

California has the nation’s highest poverty rate—19% in the years 2015-17. In Texas, 14.7% were estimated to live in poverty. Proportionately, California’s poverty rate is 29% higher than Texas’.

... With a population just as diverse as California’s, Texas’ policies produce a more prosperous people who, across similar demographic groups, are 27% less likely to suffer from poverty than their California cousins.

I'm convinced that part of Bloomberg's model for CA is the fact that they have generated so many poor people who will either vote for the rich Elites or allow those Elites to rig the elections (shotgun primary - really?) so that they don't lose. They don't want thinking voters because those people will not cow-tow to the Elite agenda. That model is working in Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia. They are working on spreading it to the suburbs and, unfortunately, some of the suburban women are falling for it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... urces.html

Bloomberg wants Hillary for VP.

philip964 wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 12:58 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... urces.html

Bloomberg wants Hillary for VP.

Bloomberg didn't kill himself.

Due to being vertically challenged, he'll be standing on a platform during the debates. Sounds like a case of Napoleonic complex and I don't expect the Swamp Fox will miss any opportunity to point that out.

Then again, if he chooses Ho-Larry as his running mate, should he win the presidency, I expect he'll have a very short life expectancy.

He doesnt realize that 24 hours after he is wins he will commit suicide does he?

anygunanywhere wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:18 pm

philip964 wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 12:58 pm https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... urces.html

Bloomberg wants Hillary for VP.

Bloomberg didn't kill himself.

...yet

K-Texas wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:26 pm Due to being vertically challenged, he'll be standing on a platform during the debates. Sounds like a case of Napoleonic complex and I don't expect the Swamp Fox will miss any opportunity to point that out.

Then again, if he chooses Ho-Larry as his running mate, should he win the presidency, I expect he'll have a very short life expectancy.

Mike Bloomberg and Hillary Clinton could not run on the same ticket, as they are from the same State and the Constitution (remember that?) prevents it. Two residents of the same State cannot be elected by the Electors as President and Vice-President. They have both missed the deadline to change residency. If they were to be on the same ticket, I believe they’d have to sacrifice the electoral vote from NY. That’d obviously be a nonstarter for a Dem win.

Flightmare wrote: Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:07 pm Mike Bloomberg and Hillary Clinton could not run on the same ticket, as they are from the same State and the Constitution (remember that?) prevents it. Two residents of the same State cannot be elected by the Electors as President and Vice-President. They have both missed the deadline to change residency. If they were to be on the same ticket, I believe they’d have to sacrifice the electoral vote from NY. That’d obviously be a nonstarter for a Dem win.

Here's my conspiracy theory... I don't think Bloomberg got in to win the nomination (though he might actually be able to buy it). I think he got in to wildly spend his money against Trump during the primaries. He isn't limited in how much of his own money he can use.