TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 1:50 pm https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/ar ... amid-chaos

New $600 million dollar bridge opens in LA then closes as taken over by street racers, performers and protestors.

Got absolutely no sympathy for them. They can vote for politicians who will fund the police and prosecute criminals if they want it fixed. They are getting exactly what they voted for. Texas just needs to build a wall to keep them out of our state.

Rafe wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 3:40 pmMichelle Malkin, as a first-generation American and the daughter of Asian parents, has interesting--but not certainly not "woke"--observations about the actual ethnically-targeted violence we've been seeing against Asians in this recent opinion piece in the Norfolk Daily News: https://norfolkdailynews.com/commentary ... 12012.html.

I'm presently finishing up her book "Culture of Corruption" (2009) about the Obama administration. I didn't think my eyes could be opened up any more about how corrupt the Clinton and Obama administrations were. I was wrong. And incase anybody claims she's talking out of her rear, the last 79 pages of this 376 page book are notes and index. She backs up everything she claims. I've just started following her on Facebook. When I clicked the link on her FB page to go to her website, I got a notice that the Face-place couldn't send me to that site because it violates their "community standards." Sickening. I was able to copy and paste the URL. Think I'm going to be a real fan.

philip964 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 02, 2020 2:39 pm https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/01/cali ... -registry/

Apparently sodomy with a minor is no longer a big deal in California.

I saw this and was outrage. I've probably shared it on FB or another forum. Fortunately for the children in CA, it seems this is untrue. I found a link to the bill and could find no such language. Politifact also says it's not true.
There were a couple of passages saying it was:
(f) It shall be a defense to any prosecution under this section that a parent or guardian committed the act charged in aid of legitimate sex education.
(g) It shall be a defense in any prosecution under this section that the act charged was committed in aid of legitimate scientific or educational purposes.

Those still sound like a backdoor to Pedophilia to me.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/face ... ends=false