Thanks Keith. So the bill gives express permission for the parking lot. I still don't see how it doesn't apply to a non-CHL holder, but perhaps I am not understanding how the sentence is structured.Keith B wrote:CHL is only required if you are in the Gas/Oil industry. And, the way the bill is written, if you are an employee and they have a 30.06 sign on the property, it does not apply to you for the parking lot.thr_wedge wrote:Please move if this belongs in another place. What is to stop an employer from posting 30.06 signs at the parking lot? Then CHLs would be prohibited by state law (which the SB 321 says is an exception to the new law) and since a CHL is required to have the firearm under SB 321 as part of the new law, you can't claim that you are carrying under the motorist protection act.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB681/SB321 Parking Lots Bill is on the Floor”
- Thu May 05, 2011 1:31 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB681/SB321 Parking Lots Bill is on the Floor
- Replies: 205
- Views: 55399
Re: HB681/SB321 Parking Lots Bill is on the Floor
- Thu May 05, 2011 10:10 am
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB681/SB321 Parking Lots Bill is on the Floor
- Replies: 205
- Views: 55399
Re: HB681/SB321 Parking Lots Bill is on the Floor
Please move if this belongs in another place. What is to stop an employer from posting 30.06 signs at the parking lot? Then CHLs would be prohibited by state law (which the SB 321 says is an exception to the new law) and since a CHL is required to have the firearm under SB 321 as part of the new law, you can't claim that you are carrying under the motorist protection act.