Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Umm, there's your problem. BWW is not cheap, their portions are small, and their food sucks. Everytime I go there I walk out $10 poorer and still hungry.nitrogen wrote:My wife and I like to go eat there, because the food is good and cheap.
jeeperbryan wrote:Umm, there's your problem. BWW is not cheap, their portions are small, and their food sucks. Everytime I go there I walk out $10 poorer and still hungry.nitrogen wrote:My wife and I like to go eat there, because the food is good and cheap.
Support your local Hooters.
...I thought they were a bit expensive and the wings I got there seem kind of scrawny...like they came from an Ethiopian chicken.mmm...pluckers...Biga9999 wrote:If you have one in your area, Plucker's is great.
I don't push the "white letters on glass" or because the english and spanish were the same color, thus failing the "contrasting colors" requirement, but I think the 1" letters requirement is extremely clear. If they meant 3/4" letters were close enough, they would have said something vague like "large letters." You MIGHT take a ride on 3/4" letters, but I'd bet $100k that you will not be convicted on 3/4" letters, therefore, I'll push that one.GrillKing wrote:I don't worry about gunbuster signs, "No Guns" and the like, but I agree with Jim on "close to compliant". I hear a lot of argument about "it's not compliant because it is white letters on glass". I think you will take a ride on that one and likely be convicted. If the letters are 3/4", the same: ride and convicted. If it is close, I take it as compliant.
I disagree with you Jim on notification. If they are clearly non-compliant, why tell them? Right, wrong, otherwise, it is just my view
Ask him to post "WHITES ONLY" and see what a stink people will raise over something so silly and meaningless as a little sign.nitrogen wrote:"I'm sorry I have to lose your business OVER A SIGN." he said.
That is exactly part of why I called DPS, and that is exactly what the young lady I was talking to stated: That they didn't care about the size, or even the exact wording, as long as they made an effort at posting, that was good enough for them, and would I like the opportunity to be a test case. Now even if you were serious about the $100k, I don't think winning the bet would be worth it, and losing would be very expensive without the bet.SlowDave wrote:I don't push the "white letters on glass" or because the english and spanish were the same color, thus failing the "contrasting colors" requirement, but I think the 1" letters requirement is extremely clear. If they meant 3/4" letters were close enough, they would have said something vague like "large letters." You MIGHT take a ride on 3/4" letters, but I'd bet $100k that you will not be convicted on 3/4" letters, therefore, I'll push that one.
jeeperbryan wrote:Umm, there's your problem. BWW is not cheap, their portions are small, and their food sucks. Everytime I go there I walk out $10 poorer and still hungry.nitrogen wrote:My wife and I like to go eat there, because the food is good and cheap.
Support your local Hooters.
.Its page two, the application of Godwins Law cant be far behind.03Lightningrocks wrote:LOL...you got to love it. This thread has turned into a rating thread for chicken wing joints. The mods should sticky this thread so we can keep up with the latest trends in chicken wings
No, my mustache is bigger than Hitler's and I am shaved bald, I don't look like him at all.mymojo wrote:Its page two, the application of Godwins Law cant be far behind.03Lightningrocks wrote:LOL...you got to love it. This thread has turned into a rating thread for chicken wing joints. The mods should sticky this thread so we can keep up with the latest trends in chicken wings
I haven't read the code in awhile, but I don't think the "contrasting colors" requirement refers to the colors of the English text vis-a-vie the Spanish text but rather the color of either text against the background. This ensures that the lettering stands out against the background and is clearly legible (ie. no slightly-off-white letters against a white sign).SlowDave wrote: I don't push the "white letters on glass" or because the english and spanish were the same color, thus failing the "contrasting colors" requirement, but I think the 1" letters requirement is extremely clear. If they meant 3/4" letters were close enough, they would have said something vague like "large letters." You MIGHT take a ride on 3/4" letters, but I'd bet $100k that you will not be convicted on 3/4" letters, therefore, I'll push that one.
TrueFlog wrote:I haven't read the code in awhile, but I don't think the "contrasting colors" requirement refers to the colors of the English text vis-a-vie the Spanish text but rather the color of either text against the background. This ensures that the lettering stands out against the background and is clearly legible (ie. no slightly-off-white letters against a white sign).SlowDave wrote: I don't push the "white letters on glass" or because the english and spanish were the same color, thus failing the "contrasting colors" requirement, but I think the 1" letters requirement is extremely clear. If they meant 3/4" letters were close enough, they would have said something vague like "large letters." You MIGHT take a ride on 3/4" letters, but I'd bet $100k that you will not be convicted on 3/4" letters, therefore, I'll push that one.
