I was just answeing the question regarding the penalty. As far as having it in the car and not on your person, it doesn't have to be physically on you, it could be "on or about" you (within easy reach). Although the penalty has been removed, I still inform if I am carrying, even if is locked in the trunk of the car. But thats just me.donh wrote:Hold on JJVP, I think you should always present your CHL with your DL; the question was whether you needed to volunteer the information that, while you were not carrying on your person, you did have a gun concealed in your car. (Say I'm splitting hairs if you will (I'm an engineer, after all), but I still think there's a clear distinction, and I haven't heard a definitive answer yet. (Just to keep the convo on course...)
Concealed in the Car
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Concealed in the Car
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: Concealed in the Car
It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.
Which begs the question in the case of a CHL holder: Is the purpose of the required disclosure to inform the officer of the driver's CHL status, or to give notice of the possible presence of a handgun?
If the latter, it certainly is somewhat discriminatory. although to no particular purpose. It's just kinda nosey IMHO.
Which begs the question in the case of a CHL holder: Is the purpose of the required disclosure to inform the officer of the driver's CHL status, or to give notice of the possible presence of a handgun?
If the latter, it certainly is somewhat discriminatory. although to no particular purpose. It's just kinda nosey IMHO.

Re: Concealed in the Car
Just another example of fixing the statutes bit by bit, piece by piece, over several sessions of the legislature.casingpoint wrote:It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.
Which begs the question in the case of a CHL holder: Is the purpose of the required disclosure to inform the officer of the driver's CHL status, or to give notice of the possible presence of a handgun?
If the latter, it certainly is somewhat discriminatory. although to no particular purpose. It's just kinda nosey IMHO.
Re: Concealed in the Car
Since getting my CHL I have had to present my CHL twice to officers for speeding. They both asked if I was carrying, I said yes both times, and both of them never acted any different than any other time I have been pulled over. They took my license walked back to the car came back and said slow it down have a nice day. They never asked to see the pistol they never asked where it was in the vehicle.
6th Generation Texan
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:27 pm
Re: Concealed in the Car
Worse is a felon doesn't have to answer the question. Fifth amendment rights.casingpoint wrote:It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.
Who is a bigger threat to a police officer? The CHL who doesn't want to get a speeding ticket or the criminal who doesn't want to go back to prison?