Concealed in the Car

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Concealed in the Car

Post by JJVP »

donh wrote:Hold on JJVP, I think you should always present your CHL with your DL; the question was whether you needed to volunteer the information that, while you were not carrying on your person, you did have a gun concealed in your car. (Say I'm splitting hairs if you will (I'm an engineer, after all), but I still think there's a clear distinction, and I haven't heard a definitive answer yet. (Just to keep the convo on course...)
I was just answeing the question regarding the penalty. As far as having it in the car and not on your person, it doesn't have to be physically on you, it could be "on or about" you (within easy reach). Although the penalty has been removed, I still inform if I am carrying, even if is locked in the trunk of the car. But thats just me.
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Concealed in the Car

Post by casingpoint »

It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.

Which begs the question in the case of a CHL holder: Is the purpose of the required disclosure to inform the officer of the driver's CHL status, or to give notice of the possible presence of a handgun?

If the latter, it certainly is somewhat discriminatory. although to no particular purpose. It's just kinda nosey IMHO. :headscratch
chabouk
Banned
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:01 am

Re: Concealed in the Car

Post by chabouk »

casingpoint wrote:It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.

Which begs the question in the case of a CHL holder: Is the purpose of the required disclosure to inform the officer of the driver's CHL status, or to give notice of the possible presence of a handgun?

If the latter, it certainly is somewhat discriminatory. although to no particular purpose. It's just kinda nosey IMHO. :headscratch
Just another example of fixing the statutes bit by bit, piece by piece, over several sessions of the legislature.
texas1234
Senior Member
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:22 am

Re: Concealed in the Car

Post by texas1234 »

Since getting my CHL I have had to present my CHL twice to officers for speeding. They both asked if I was carrying, I said yes both times, and both of them never acted any different than any other time I have been pulled over. They took my license walked back to the car came back and said slow it down have a nice day. They never asked to see the pistol they never asked where it was in the vehicle.
6th Generation Texan
Marty Graw
Junior Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:27 pm

Re: Concealed in the Car

Post by Marty Graw »

casingpoint wrote:It is illogical a person with a CHL be required to inform a cop he has a handgun in his vehicle, while one without a CHL is not required to inform if a handgun is within.
Worse is a felon doesn't have to answer the question. Fifth amendment rights.

Who is a bigger threat to a police officer? The CHL who doesn't want to get a speeding ticket or the criminal who doesn't want to go back to prison?
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”