That being the case, it would mean that visitors must fend for themselves even more than on other public property and that carry would make even more sense.chasfm11 wrote: OE is very clear - they are in the flood control business and anything else that they do is secondary at best. The basis for my other problem was the COE making it convenient for themselves by granting a monopoly on Grapevine line, to the determent of the public. I suspect that their anti-gun policies have the same roots - COE convenience.
At the same time, it tells me that the chance of being caught carrying is minimal, which you can interpert as you'd like.