Administrative Interpretation Error?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Oehamilton
Junior Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:57 am
Location: Denton, TX
Contact:

Re: Administrative Interpretation Error?

Post by Oehamilton »

I just did the whole process over including training. Thanks for all the advice and input!
What we do in life echoes in eternity!
tommyg
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Dale, TX

Re: Administrative Interpretation Error?

Post by tommyg »

go thru the app process again and put up with it fighting the burocrats is more trouble that re applying
N.R.A. benefactor Member :tiphat: Please Support the N.R.A. :patriot:
JKTex
Senior Member
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:28 am
Location: Flower Mound

Re: Administrative Interpretation Error?

Post by JKTex »

tommyg wrote:go thru the app process again and put up with it fighting the burocrats is more trouble that re applying
Um, that was what he just updated he did (which bumped this old thread up). :mrgreen:
Oehamilton wrote:I just did the whole process over including training. Thanks for all the advice and input!
Now that this is bumped, I was curious.....if I understand what happened, they said your CHL-100 was missing originally and that's what the letter was, which you received but apparently didn't respond to. You say the CHL-100 was not required due to it being your 3rd renewal. If that's the case, why could they not fix what would have been "their" mistake? Or were they standing on the fact that you never responded therefore it was too late to fix their mistake?

I could understand it if by the application being "terminated", they mean it was purged into the depths of never never land, never to be seen again.
Oehamilton
Junior Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:57 am
Location: Denton, TX
Contact:

Re: Administrative Interpretation Error?

Post by Oehamilton »

I did get a letter about missing training document. I did not respond in time. But my original complaint was, if you mess up your renewal application, you are they required to start over as a New Orignial Applicant, instead of having to start a New Renewal Application. There's a difference in time and money between the two, as you know. In the statue, it states that you will have to start a new application, if you miss the deadline. It does not state that you have to start the application process as though you are a New Original Applicant even if this is your third renewal. In essence, you're reset to ground zero as though you have never had a CHL before. I could see that if my current CHL license had expired, but it had not. In fact, I went through the whole Original license process again and received my new CHL before my old one had expired.
What we do in life echoes in eternity!
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”