Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

smoothoperator
Senior Member
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:15 pm

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by smoothoperator »

Jaguar wrote:
A-R wrote:So some "higher authority" will decide when, where, if we're allowed to use a cell phone?

:banghead:

What's next?
That was my first thought, how many videos are out there where the cops say, "you can't record me" or words to that effect. Now they won't have to say a thing, just activate their app and, presto – change-o, your video recording device is now inoperative.
Only if you're an Apple lemming.
User avatar
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by JJVP »

Jaguar wrote:
A-R wrote:So some "higher authority" will decide when, where, if we're allowed to use a cell phone?

:banghead:

What's next?
That was my first thought, how many videos are out there where the cops say, "you can't record me" or words to that effect. Now they won't have to say a thing, just activate their app and, presto – change-o, your video recording device is now inoperative.
That only works with a smartphone. It does nothing to a video recorder, remember those?
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar
snatchel
Senior Member
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:16 pm
Location: West Texas

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by snatchel »

I personally don't want anyone interfering with my phone usage.\
No More Signature
User avatar
Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by Jaguar »

JJVP wrote:
Jaguar wrote:
A-R wrote:So some "higher authority" will decide when, where, if we're allowed to use a cell phone?

:banghead:

What's next?
That was my first thought, how many videos are out there where the cops say, "you can't record me" or words to that effect. Now they won't have to say a thing, just activate their app and, presto – change-o, your video recording device is now inoperative.
That only works with a smartphone. It does nothing to a video recorder, remember those?
Yeah, I might even have one around here, somewhere.

My Samsung dumb phone records video, not well, but it does.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
User avatar
sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by sjfcontrol »

Hmm... Those that want to disable the use of cellphones in moving vehicles forget that there may be people in the car other than the driver that would be affected by those limitations, too.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Apple Granted Patent to Disable iPhone Recordings

Post by Dave2 »

sjfcontrol wrote:Hmm... Those that want to disable the use of cellphones in moving vehicles forget that there may be people in the car other than the driver that would be affected by those limitations, too.
Some of them don't care. The topic comes up on Slashdot from time to time. Someone always mentions this, and a bunch of other people always reply along the lines of, "But this is getting out of hand... We have to do something!" .

(Personally, I think that statement is a load of horsefeathers... No, we don't have to do some thing; we have to do the right thing, or at least not one of plethora of obviously wrong things.)

((Kinda like how I generally dismiss politicians who say, "do it for the children", unless the "it" in question actually is directly related to children (even then, they'll probably still be wrong).))
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”