Yep; this. Barrel length and caliber are generally the main criteria for me...assuming, of course, I've proven that the gun runs happily with a given choice.The Annoyed Man wrote:Problem is, I have more than one carry pistol, and I use different loads in them, so I can't answer the poll.
My preferred carry is a 1911, and the round I settled on several years ago is the Winchester Ranger T-Series, RA45T. I like staying with 230-grains for the .45 ACP. When dress makes the full-size less practical, I'll generally go with a small form-factor 1911-style pistol with a 3-inch barrel. For that one, to help compensate for the short barrel, I use the Ranger T-Series RA45TP, the +P version. The downside is that the higher pressure in a much lighter gun makes follow-up shots more difficult. I feel I shoot it well enough to get the job done, and at five yards I'm just about equally fast. Move it to 15 yards with equal accuracy, and the full-sized 1911 is definitely faster.
My second-favorite carry is a full-sized Springfield XD(M) in .40 S&W. Usually an OWB winter carry. I also used to use a 180-grain Ranger T-Series, but recently switched to the Hornady Critical Duty 175-grain. The specs seem impressive; it generates about 20 fps greater muzzle velocity than the Winchester in a bullet that stays close to 180 grains; and I like the extra attention to dealing with setback with the cannelured bullet and crimping. The Springer has eaten every type of ammo I've ever given it, and the Hornady is no exception.
For my primary pocket pistol, a Kahr PM9, I similarly switched to Hornady Critical Duty, the 135-grain +P round. It has the same features of the other Critical Duty ammo types, but boasts a 135-grain bullet in +P. The muzzle velocity is 1,100 fps--so fractionally slower than comparable 124-grain +P ammo--but I like the extra bullet weight, especially when combined with the Critical Duty penetration specs. It's a tiny gun, and I don't use mag extensions (kinda defeats the purpose of a tiny gun, IMHO), so once again I'm sacrificing some control on follow-ups shots.
Quick comment on that. If ever forced to use a carry pistol in an urban environment, the best statistics we have show that encounters are far more likely to occur at distances of less than 10 feet, not at 10 yards. In fact, 81% of fatal encounters are at six feet or less; an additional 9% occur between six and 15 feet. So to be honest, I'm not terribly worried about being able to execute a tack-driving Mozambique at 15 yards. I'm not on SEAL Team 6.
