You are correct. It also applies to those carrying under the Motorist Protection Act in Texas.fickman wrote:But a non-CHLer, who is otherwise free to carry a long gun in Texas (visible or concealed; on their person or in their car). . . the GFSZ restriction would apply to them, even for long guns?Jumping Frog wrote:Texas CHL's are completely exempt from the federal GFSZ restrictions regarding any schools in Texas. Doesn't matter what kind of gun or where you are.
My understanding is "yes". If I'm right, then that is also important info for OP.
Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
- Jumping Frog
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
I would say "theoretically yes". Under the strict interpretation of the law, non-licensees cannot have a loaded firearm within 1000 feet. But under the real world, this is a federal law that is not being charged by local and state law enforcement, and ordinary citizens are not being charged. Heck over 90% of the urban/suburban population live within 1000 feet of a school, and it is literally impossible to drIve around in a car and comply with this stupid and misguided federal law.
From what I have read, the law is rarely -- VERY rarely -- enforced, and when someone is actually charged they are a criminal being charged for other crimes and the GFSZ is simply an add-on charge. For example, a drug dealer arrested by the DEA for peddling drugs near a school will also get the GFSZ charge tacked on.
From what I have read, the law is rarely -- VERY rarely -- enforced, and when someone is actually charged they are a criminal being charged for other crimes and the GFSZ is simply an add-on charge. For example, a drug dealer arrested by the DEA for peddling drugs near a school will also get the GFSZ charge tacked on.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Good to know.Jumping Frog wrote:I would say "theoretically yes". Under the strict interpretation of the law, non-licensees cannot have a loaded firearm within 1000 feet. But under the real world, this is a federal law that is not being charged by local and state law enforcement, and ordinary citizens are not being charged. Heck over 90% of the urban/suburban population live within 1000 feet of a school, and it is literally impossible to drIve around in a car and comply with this stupid and misguided federal law.
From what I have read, the law is rarely -- VERY rarely -- enforced, and when someone is actually charged they are a criminal being charged for other crimes and the GFSZ is simply an add-on charge. For example, a drug dealer arrested by the DEA for peddling drugs near a school will also get the GFSZ charge tacked on.
Native Texian
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
I know you said you are going to transport your AR in the box but I wonder what kinda looks someone would get (if any) going through that Border Patrol check point in Sierra Blanca on I10 with it exposed?
TSRA
NRA
TFC
USMC 1961-1966
NRA
TFC
USMC 1961-1966
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
That is what I thought. Wouldn't the MPA apply anyway?RioGrandeShooter wrote:Thanks.. I just found the TX laws on rifles/shotguns in the vehicle. They can be loaded and such..
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
No, the MPA is designed for handguns. Long guns are already legal.
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Learn something new every day!rm9792 wrote:No, the MPA is designed for handguns. Long guns are already legal.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Here's the text of the actual bill:Purplehood wrote:Learn something new every day!rm9792 wrote:No, the MPA is designed for handguns. Long guns are already legal.
http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/80 ... 01815F.HTM(a) A person commits an offense if the person [he]
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or
her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
TANSTAAFL
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
I was headed out to the rifle club a few weeks ago and had not bothered to sack up my 995 carbine which looks scary tactical and had it in the passenger seat of my truck.
Was stopped by a sherrifs deputy that was running a road block for a bycycle race. He didn't say anything or seem to care.
Was stopped by a sherrifs deputy that was running a road block for a bycycle race. He didn't say anything or seem to care.
Texas CHL Instructor, NRA Certified Trainer, IDPA
NRA Range Safety Officer
http://www.tacticalpistol.us
NRA Range Safety Officer
http://www.tacticalpistol.us
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Does the MPA cover knives in a car???
N.R.A. benefactor Member
Please Support the N.R.A. 


Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
I answered this 2 posts up. MPA covers handguns, illegal knives and clubs.tommyg wrote:Does the MPA cover knives in a car???
TANSTAAFL
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
sorry I missed your previous post
N.R.A. benefactor Member
Please Support the N.R.A. 


Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
They might give you some grief. My son was told by one of the BP agents at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint that it was illegal for him to carry a handgun in the car since he didn't have a CHL. My son told the guy, 'The gun is unloaded in a suite case in the trunk." the agent said doesn't matter it's still illegal. Agent asked to see the gun, my son told him he could see the gun but that it was not illegal to carry a handgun in the car loaded or not as long as it was concealed. PB agent wouldn't believe him, finally the agent said he would let my son go with a warning not to carry the gun anymore.stash wrote:I know you said you are going to transport your AR in the box but I wonder what kinda looks someone would get (if any) going through that Border Patrol check point in Sierra Blanca on I10 with it exposed?

Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Good time to request a supervisor to be present.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:25 pm
Re: Rifle transport without rifle case in rear of SUV.
Amen. Also a good time to get out your iPhone and start the video rolling. Of course, that really gets them roiled...so who knows?
CHL Received 5/16/11
Proud Member NRA
Proud Member Texas Concealed Handgun Association
Proud Member Second Amendment Foundation
Proud Member of The Truth Squad founded by Tom Gresham. "A lie left unchallenged becomes the truth"
Proud Member NRA
Proud Member Texas Concealed Handgun Association
Proud Member Second Amendment Foundation
Proud Member of The Truth Squad founded by Tom Gresham. "A lie left unchallenged becomes the truth"