That interchange was actually funny between him and Pancho and backtreadlightly wrote:Kory Watkins up in a moment. That will be about as much as I can take. I'm sure I'll be able to shut off the live stream then.
almost civilized ... almost
Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton
That interchange was actually funny between him and Pancho and backtreadlightly wrote:Kory Watkins up in a moment. That will be about as much as I can take. I'm sure I'll be able to shut off the live stream then.
Exception: Private party saleRuark wrote: One erroneous claim that being frequently made is that it removes the background check as a safety measure. It doesn't. You still need an FBI background check to buy your gun in the first place.
This is a flaw with unlicensed carry and federal law. To fix this issue you would have to go to the federal level and correct the problem there.Stripes Dude wrote:So what's the solve for federal statute that requires a CHl from the resident state to legally pass through a school zone? Are we supposed to ignore this?
Wish the powers that be who are involved in this constitutional carry fight would address this. They all seem to be missing this very important fact.
My neighborhood is surrounded by school zones. I won't be able to leave the house if I don't have a Chl even if constitutional carry passes.
This needs addressed or this is a moot law for many people...unless you're willing to drive around avoiding school zones.
1. GFSZA requires a license from the state the school is in, not a resident license.Stripes Dude wrote:So what's the solve for federal statute that requires a CHl from the resident state to legally pass through a school zone? Are we supposed to ignore this?
Ok, I stand corrected. Makes absolutely no difference. Still illegal federally. MPA was step one, constitutional carry is step two of going down the path of not dealing with the bigger issue.Lambda Force wrote:1. GFSZA requires a license from the state the school is in, not a resident license.Stripes Dude wrote:So what's the solve for federal statute that requires a CHl from the resident state to legally pass through a school zone? Are we supposed to ignore this?
2. MPA already opened that can of worms.
I'll get excited about this when that is dealt with.G.A. Heath wrote:This is a flaw with unlicensed carry and federal law. To fix this issue you would have to go to the federal level and correct the problem there.
All my guns are hot...not that I carry my rifles in walmart but...if I WERE to carry my AR in the walmart, the chamber WOULD be occupied. Not a fan of Kory Watkins. One reason being that he says things that should be left unsaid. What he said served no point in regards tp chambered or not chambered. The law does not, in any way, differentiate a loaded gun from an unloaded one...irrelevant to the discussion...treadlightly wrote:I was pleasantly surprised to see Kory Watkins so well behaved, but then he compared his Glock, subject to licensed carry, to his AK47, which he said he carried all over the place with a full magazine and a round in the chamber.
Pardon me for being a prude, but I would never carry any weapon, rifle or pistol, with or without a safety, with a round in the chamber unless the gun was holstered with the trigger fully shrouded. An AK on a sling with a round in the chamber while contra dancing the aisles at Home Depot? No thanks. A properly holstered pistol with a protected trigger and a chambered round? Sure. No reason not to.
Up to the point he mentioned his hot AK, I thought he was almost reasonable.
RogueUSMC wrote:All my guns are hot...not that I carry my rifles in walmart but...if I WERE to carry my AR in the walmart, the chamber WOULD be occupied. Not a fan of Kory Watkins. One reason being that he says things that should be left unsaid. What he said served no point in regards tp chambered or not chambered. The law does not, in any way, differentiate a loaded gun from an unloaded one...irrelevant to the discussion...treadlightly wrote:I was pleasantly surprised to see Kory Watkins so well behaved, but then he compared his Glock, subject to licensed carry, to his AK47, which he said he carried all over the place with a full magazine and a round in the chamber.
Pardon me for being a prude, but I would never carry any weapon, rifle or pistol, with or without a safety, with a round in the chamber unless the gun was holstered with the trigger fully shrouded. An AK on a sling with a round in the chamber while contra dancing the aisles at Home Depot? No thanks. A properly holstered pistol with a protected trigger and a chambered round? Sure. No reason not to.
Up to the point he mentioned his hot AK, I thought he was almost reasonable.