S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
longhorn_92
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1621
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:07 pm

S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#1

Post by longhorn_92 »

A firearm instructor for the San Antonio Police Department said the Smith & Wesson M&P40 is the right gun for officers.

On Monday, firearm instructor Rob Ingram showed KSAT 12 News police beat reporter Matt Rivers why the Smith & Wesson M&P40 is a better firearm than the Glock 22, which will be replaced soon.

http://www.ksat.com/news/New-SAPD-servi ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are there any other large city police departments making the transition from Glock to Smith and Wesson? I think S&W M&P will take huge chunks of sales from Glock in police departments...

What are your thoughts?
“If you try to shoot me, I will have to shoot you back, and I promise you I won’t miss!”

NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26803
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#2

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I don't know much about large departments and gun selection, but I have noticed that a lot of cops in my area seem to carry the M&P.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#3

Post by jmra »

Could mean some really good deals on police trade-ins.

Assuming this happens before any ban.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#4

Post by A-R »

Austin PD started the transition to M&P40 last year. They had previously issued Glocks but allowed officers to carry any privately owned pistols from an approved list. The M&P is now mandatory.

However, two other smaller Austin-area departments I've heard are going to Glock 22 (from Glock 17 I believe)

Topic author
longhorn_92
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1621
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#5

Post by longhorn_92 »

jmra wrote:Could mean some really good deals on police trade-ins.

Assuming this happens before any ban.

I was just thinking that. I am sure that there will be plenty of SAPD Glocks for sale - hardly shot with some holster wear.

I still think the M&P is far superior to the Glock and police officers are finally realizing that.
“If you try to shoot me, I will have to shoot you back, and I promise you I won’t miss!”

NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#6

Post by jmra »

longhorn_92 wrote:
jmra wrote:Could mean some really good deals on police trade-ins.

Assuming this happens before any ban.

I was just thinking that. I am sure that there will be plenty of SAPD Glocks for sale - hardly shot with some holster wear.

I still think the M&P is far superior to the Glock and police officers are finally realizing that.
Last gun show in FW had some Glock 22 police trade-ins. Lots of holster wear but all functional parts seemed in good condition. They were asking $349. If we see big shifts by PDs that price could drop below $300. Much lower than that I might have to buy a new safe to house a dozen or so. :mrgreen:
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#7

Post by gigag04 »

We went from Gen 2 and 3 G22s to Gen 3 21SF.

I like the M&P well enough, but still siding with Glock (I'm like 60/40).
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison

Weg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:06 pm

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#8

Post by Weg »

I thinking of going with something other than my Glock 30 for carry, it just broke on me for the second time in the last 2,000 rds., not sure if I just have a lemon or it is common, but i'm losing confidence. First time the slide stop spring broke, which caused the slide lock to "walk" out and the slide to just about come off the gun. Now last weekend, the slide catch spring broke causing it lock open after each round. On the bright side, the gun never jams, except when it breaks!

Topic author
longhorn_92
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1621
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#9

Post by longhorn_92 »

I wonder if SAPD got a sweetheart of a deal from Smith and Wesson? I am sure their marketing department helped to secure the sell too? I wonder if The department is paying for accessories such as belts and holsters?
“If you try to shoot me, I will have to shoot you back, and I promise you I won’t miss!”

NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member

RHenriksen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: Houston

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#10

Post by RHenriksen »

I've read that the M&P's multiple backstraps, to better fit one standardized pistol to all officers regardless of hand size, has been a major factor in getting departments to move away from Glock. Not sure what all else plays into it.
I'll quit carrying a gun when they make murder and armed robbery illegal

Houston Technology Consulting
soup-to-nuts IT infrastructure design, deployment, and support for SMBs

texanjoker

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#11

Post by texanjoker »

longhorn_92 wrote:
jmra wrote:Could mean some really good deals on police trade-ins.

Assuming this happens before any ban.

I was just thinking that. I am sure that there will be plenty of SAPD Glocks for sale - hardly shot with some holster wear.

I still think the M&P is far superior to the Glock and police officers are finally realizing that.
GTs in Austin has glock 22 trade ins for $329. They had some down to $289 as well, but I think those sold out.
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#12

Post by gigag04 »

Weg wrote:I thinking of going with something other than my Glock 30 for carry, it just broke on me for the second time in the last 2,000 rds., not sure if I just have a lemon or it is common, but i'm losing confidence. First time the slide stop spring broke, which caused the slide lock to "walk" out and the slide to just about come off the gun. Now last weekend, the slide catch spring broke causing it lock open after each round. On the bright side, the gun never jams, except when it breaks!
Contact Glock for return shipping - they will fix it.

Gen 3 or 4?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison

gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#13

Post by gthaustex »

Weird thing to me is that the SAPD instructor is quoted as saying that he wants to move away from Glock as the M&P allows for shooters with different hand sizes to be more comfortable, as well as being friendly to both left and right handed shooters. The Gen4 Glocks have interchangeable backstraps and reversible magazine catches....

I guess perhaps their current Glock inventory is not Gen4 and S&W offered them a sweetheart deal? Anyway, it just sounded like they were switching because S&W offered something that Glock didn't....
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#14

Post by A-R »

gthaustex wrote:Weird thing to me is that the SAPD instructor is quoted as saying that he wants to move away from Glock as the M&P allows for shooters with different hand sizes to be more comfortable, as well as being friendly to both left and right handed shooters. The Gen4 Glocks have interchangeable backstraps and reversible magazine catches....

I guess perhaps their current Glock inventory is not Gen4 and S&W offered them a sweetheart deal? Anyway, it just sounded like they were switching because S&W offered something that Glock didn't....
S&W beat Glock to market with these features by a few years.

Also in addition to changeable backstraps the M&P's grip ergonomics (angle, shape) are generally more beneficial to a wider range of shooters, especially those with smaller hands and/or shorter fingers than even the Gen4 Glocks

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5278
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: S&W M&P40 to replace Glock 22

#15

Post by srothstein »

longhorn_92 wrote:I wonder if SAPD got a sweetheart of a deal from Smith and Wesson? I am sure their marketing department helped to secure the sell too? I wonder if The department is paying for accessories such as belts and holsters?
If they did, it must have been a much better deal and marketing job than they did in 91/92 when SAPD first switched to Glocks. The department compared/tested five different pistols, but I don't remember which S&W auto it was (probably a 4046 at the time). The Academy training staff were pushing so hard for Glocks that it had an unbeatable position before the contract bids were opened. Rumor had it that Glock was told to redo their bid because their first bid did not include any spare parts or warranty, which was one of the requirements.

And to read now that one of the firearms instructors thinks S&W is the better pistol tells me two things. First is that there has been a changing of the guard in the academy staff. And secondly, that the academy staff is still going to get the pistol they prefer, no matter what the patrol officers want. The latter may or may not be a good thing. I know some of the patrolman would probably still be carrying their revolvers if they were given a choice. That also may or may not be a good thing.
Steve Rothstein
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”