TCU decides to opt out of SB11

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

jkurtz
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:12 pm

TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by jkurtz »

I just received this email from TCU a few minutes ago.
Dear TCU Faculty, Staff and Students,

Since August, we have been discussing and debating campus safety in light of Senate Bill 11, commonly known as the Campus Carry law in Texas. As you may know, SB 11 amends the Government and Penal Code of Texas allowing concealed handgun license owners to carry a gun on college and university campuses in Texas. It also allows private universities a provision to opt out of the law following a process of consultation with faculty, staff and students.

We engaged in a public debate and open forums, and sought your input through governance groups, a student poll and a common email. The Cabinet and TCU's Board of Trustees thoughtfully considered the feedback from each of these sources in assessing the community’s desires related to our option in the law.

The academic affairs and student relations committees recommended that the Board of Trustees opt out of SB 11, and the Board voted to affirm that recommendation this morning. As a result of this vote, the University’s policy prohibiting guns on campus remains in effect. The University will now begin the process of defining all strategies and policies associated with this Board decision.

Through this process we have learned a great deal about our community’s commitment to the safety and personal campus culture. We will continue to use your feedback to address opportunities for improvement in our physical facilities, police coverage and additional training moving forward.

The safety and security of our community are of the utmost importance. This afternoon you will be able to find a fact sheet on the TCU website that highlights additional security measures that we employ to keep our campus as safe as possible.

Again, thank you for your participation in this process.

Sincerely,

Kathy Cavins-Tull
Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
User avatar
mojo84
Senior Member
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by mojo84 »

Very disappointing. It's a shame they think a school campus is so much different than other places.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
jed
Member
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 7:43 am

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by jed »

Why/how do people keep thinking gun free zones are safer? How many times will gun free zone be proven ineffective before people start getting a clue? These people are idiots AND they keep reproducing.
TXBO
Banned
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:02 pm

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by TXBO »

Not surprising. TCU is a funded by the Disciples of Christ Church. They are not very second amendment friendly.
User avatar
Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by Beiruty »

If there is ever shooting at that campus, someone would sue them as liable for their actions and failed to provide enough security to justify banning students from defending themselves.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
jkurtz
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:12 pm

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by jkurtz »

TXBO wrote:Not surprising. TCU is a funded by the Disciples of Christ Church. They are not very second amendment friendly.
The school is affiliated with the Disciples of Christ, but not governed by them. I honestly do not know how much funding TCU receives from them.
jkurtz
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:12 pm

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by jkurtz »

Beiruty wrote:If there is ever shooting at that campus, someone would sue them as liable for their actions and failed to provide enough security to justify banning students from defending themselves.
Shouldn't have to be a shooting. During my freshman year there was a murder on campus in which the killer used a knife.

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local ... 63581.html

The article states that the student was murdered in an apartment near campus. It actually occurred in the North Tower of the Grand Marc complex which is owned by the school, therefore preventing residents from keeping arms, even in their own residence.
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13579
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by C-dub »

Just a little sanity/reality check here.

I've read this and a few other articles about TCU today and they are all still using the language that people won't be able to carry concealed handguns on campus. This is actually incorrect, right? They are still just banned from the buildings, no?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
John Galt
Senior Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 9:14 pm
Location: DFW

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by John Galt »

After seeing what has happened at other Colleges, it is utterly stupid to come to this decision.
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5069
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by RPBrown »

Just goes to show you that we have some really ignorant people teaching our kids
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
jkurtz
Member
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:12 pm

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by jkurtz »

C-dub wrote:Just a little sanity/reality check here.

I've read this and a few other articles about TCU today and they are all still using the language that people won't be able to carry concealed handguns on campus. This is actually incorrect, right? They are still just banned from the buildings, no?
I am not 100% sure, but considering that TCU is a private school I would assume that the land is also privately owned and subject to school policy. I could be wrong, but I don't want to be a test case.
User avatar
TexasJohnBoy
Banned
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by TexasJohnBoy »

The campus police will have no problem being everywhere all the time, obviously.
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
doncb
Senior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:49 am

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by doncb »

jed wrote:Why/how do people keep thinking gun free zones are safer? How many times will gun free zone be proven ineffective before people start getting a clue? These people are idiots AND they keep reproducing.
The answer is very simple. They don't think and they have no clue.
If you're standing still, you're loosing.
User avatar
oohrah
Senior Member
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 5:54 pm
Location: McLennan County

Re: TCU decides to opt out of SB11

Post by oohrah »

jkurtz wrote:
C-dub wrote:Just a little sanity/reality check here.

I've read this and a few other articles about TCU today and they are all still using the language that people won't be able to carry concealed handguns on campus. This is actually incorrect, right? They are still just banned from the buildings, no?
I am not 100% sure, but considering that TCU is a private school I would assume that the land is also privately owned and subject to school policy. I could be wrong, but I don't want to be a test case.
My understanding is that they would have to 30.06 the buildings AND the grounds.
USMC, Retired
Treating one variety of person as better or worse than others by accident of birth is morally indefensible.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”