Hearing protection

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
Zero_G
Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by Zero_G »

From my aforementioned audiologist colleague:
There's no reason to think that noise muffs are "better" protectors with impulse noise due to this bone conduction concept. Keep in mind that attenuation limits are imposed by the flanking bone-conduction pathways, to INCLUDE transmission through the skull that's not covered by noise muffs (bone conduction can transfer throughout the skull, even from the contralateral [opposite] side, with nearly no attenuation via bone conduction), and noise can transfer directly through the devices themselves.

Moreover, the seals of the muffs might, in fact, be compromised by temples of eyeglasses, shape of wearer's head/TMJ... reducing the NRRs of the muffs... maybe less protection than a well-fitted set of earplugs!

Here are some links that might help explain details.
one simple.....http://www.e-a-r.com/pdf/hearingcons/earlog9.pdf
a more complex article.... http://www.e-a-r.com/pdf/hearingcons/limits2.pdf
User avatar
Skiprr
Moderator
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Post by Skiprr »

Wow. So that giant Nerf-ball helmet I wore when I first started IDPA made sense after all! And to think so many of you guys gave me grief over that...
Image
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
User avatar
Crossfire
Moderator
Posts: 5405
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

Post by Crossfire »

L8RG8R wrote:
The Marshal wrote:Something I was told, that I do not now how much fact it is, but I will repeat as it sound really good is this:

the bone right behind your ear is 'uncovered' with in-the-ear plugs. Yet this bone transmits a high amount of sound to the inner ear.

Therefore, using ear plugs, rather than ear muffs, does not prevent the sound transferance thru the bone behind the ear, which will still cause damage to the inner ear.

That said, I tend towards the muffs....
My CHL instructor said the same thing.
Probably because that is what DPS teaches. CHL instructors must wear over the ear protection when qualifying at the DPS range.
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Post by AEA »

I just stopped going to indoor ranges and I just bought a pair of Peltor 21NRR muffs for use on an outside range for 4.50 on eBay. I think these will be fine for an outdoor range.

I suspect that those that go to indoor ranges need more NRR rating and that is fine. I do not believe that anyone needs a pair of muffs that cost 250+ for anything!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
CompVest
Senior Member
Posts: 3079
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by CompVest »

I spend a LOT of time at the range and ear comfort is very important as well as hearing what is going on around me.

My custom ear plugs are worth every penny, for safety, comfort and freedom to wear whatever head gear I want.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”