Ruger P345

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar
G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts: 2987
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Ruger P345

Post by G.A. Heath »

Bumped into a friend at the range today (Lunch hour range time). I showed him my new toy (compact 1911) and he showed me his new toy (a Ruger P345). I liked the weapon as it is a functional weapon but I did not like the lack of a safety, the really deep trigger pull, and the de-cocker scares the living daylights out of me (Can it cause the weapon to fire?). Maybe its just my 1911 addiction, but I feel that the P345 is not a good weapon to carry. If someone here carries one would they please help me correct my misconceptions regarding the weapon?
KBCraig
Banned
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Re: Ruger P345

Post by KBCraig »

G.A. Heath wrote:the de-cocker scares the living daylights out of me (Can it cause the weapon to fire?)
No, it can't.

I understand your concern, because the first time I saw someone hit the decocker on a loaded chamber, I almost soiled myself.

But if you examine the mechanism, you'll see that the decocker rotates a positive block into place before the hammer drops. It absolutely positively cannot send the firing pin into the primer.

I carry a Ruger P97DC. On the range, I hit the decocker with no worry, because it's pointed safely down range. At home when loading up or press-checking, I let the hammer down gently just to avoid mechanical stress. (And I still pay attention to muzzle direction. :cool: )

Relax. Modern decockers are absolutely safe, but you should still keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction. Basic safety rules still apply.

Kevin
User avatar
Liberty
Senior Member
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Ruger P345

Post by Liberty »

KBCraig wrote:
G.A. Heath wrote:the de-cocker scares the living daylights out of me (Can it cause the weapon to fire?)
No, it can't.

I understand your concern, because the first time I saw someone hit the decocker on a loaded chamber, I almost soiled myself.

But if you examine the mechanism, you'll see that the decocker rotates a positive block into place before the hammer drops. It absolutely positively cannot send the firing pin into the primer.

I carry a Ruger P97DC. On the range, I hit the decocker with no worry, because it's pointed safely down range. At home when loading up or press-checking, I let the hammer down gently just to avoid mechanical stress. (And I still pay attention to muzzle direction. :cool: )

Relax. Modern decockers are absolutely safe, but you should still keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction. Basic safety rules still apply.

Kevin
I Have a Ruger P95 with the manual safety, and it works the same way as the decocker. It is unnerving, even if it is safe. Its always a good idea to keep the muzzle pointed in safe direction. I usually let the hammer fly though, I hadn't though about extra wear. Something to think about though. wouldn't want to chip or break anything,
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
HooG19
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:18 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Post by HooG19 »

When the P345 first came out they said it was loosely designed around the 1911. At that time they offered a model with an external safety and a locking device that would not allow the hammer to move. This model also will not fire if no magazine is inserted. All of those features intrigued me enough to look into acquiring one for myself, but I could never find the safety version, only the decocker.

I've shot the decocker version, and I like the way it performs. I just wish I could put my hands on the safety version.

But at this point, I think I'd rather spend almost 3x the money and buy a Kimber UCII
Concealed Carry since 8/17/07
User avatar
Smokewagon
Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:49 am
Location: West Texas

Post by Smokewagon »

I have one of these and love it. It is a decocker safety. Decocking is spooky at first, but you do get used to it. Like others have said, keep it pointed in a safe direction. It also carries very well. :txflag:
Texas friendly, spoken here.
User avatar
shipwreck
Senior Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Texas

Post by shipwreck »

Well, I've owned several Berettas, and the 92s do the same thing - the decocker doesn't bother me.
User avatar
G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts: 2987
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Post by G.A. Heath »

ok, so the de-cocker is safe (It still bothers me, and probably always will) now about that trigger pull. That has to be one of the longest, if not longest, trigger pulls I have ever encountered. Therere is so much slack to take up I honestly thought the weapon had malfunctioned when I first tried to fire it. I only fired it single action as I did not like the decocker (still don't).

Its a nice gun, but I think I will stick to my 1911s with their crisp short SA triggers. In fact I don't think I will willing shoot my friends P345 again
stroo
Senior Member
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Coppell

Post by stroo »

If you go to the Ruger forum, you can find instructions on how to install a weaker trigger spring. I did that on my P 95 and it helped the trigger a lot.
User avatar
Photoman
Senior Member
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:21 pm

Post by Photoman »

G.A. Heath wrote:ok, so the de-cocker is safe (It still bothers me, and probably always will)...
As it should! It's a mechanical device and mechanical devices can fail. Like someone said, ~always~ point in a safe direction before de-cocking.
User avatar
G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts: 2987
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Post by G.A. Heath »

I do not one own, and will not own one. I will stick with my 1911s and be very happy with fewer worries.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”