Army chooses Sig

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by ELB »

IIRC a manual safety was not a requirement. It was a requirement and Glock did not put one on, their proposal would have been thrown out almost immediately. If it was a requirement, the there was a safety on their someplace.

John Farnam at the SHOT show says the Sig guys are saying their modular system was the deciding factor.
Last edited by ELB on Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar
Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Pawpaw »

Good for Sig! This should be a big feather in their cap.

This whole exercise highlights what is wrong with military procurement, specifically, and our government, in general. After 5 years and hundreds of millions of dollars, each of those $300 pistols will have cost the American taxpayers about $1,000. That is unconscionable.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

Police departments and other agencies can order the 320 with a safety or even a tabbed trigger. They don't offer it for individual purchase.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
User avatar
karder
Senior Member
Posts: 1380
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:14 pm
Location: El Paso

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by karder »

Sigs are great guns, no doubt. All things being equal, I would prefer to see our troops carrying American weapons. M&P would have been a great choice too.
“While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.” ― Samuel Adams
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
User avatar
Flightmare
Senior Member
Posts: 3101
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Flightmare »

Scott B. wrote:Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
Indeed. Based up in New Hampshire.

https://www.sigsauer.com/company/contact/
Deplorable lunatic since 2016
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9602
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by RoyGBiv »

1hzb5e[1].jpg
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by ScottDLS »

Scott B. wrote:Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
Yeah. Also, current Army pistol is by Beretta an Italian company, though I'm pretty sure all the govt contract guns are made in US.

So once the Army, Marine Corps, and Air force get their SIGs, the Navy can start replacing their 1911's (which saw action against the Kaiser) with the left over Beretta's.... :smilelol5:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar
bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by bblhd672 »

ScottDLS wrote:
Scott B. wrote:Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
Yeah. Also, current Army pistol is by Beretta an Italian company, though I'm pretty sure all the govt contract guns are made in US.

So once the Army, Marine Corps, and Air force get their SIGs, the Navy can start replacing their 1911's (which saw action against the Kaiser) with the left over Beretta's.... :smilelol5:
SEAL's have been using Sigs for a long time.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
User avatar
Liberty
Senior Member
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Liberty »

So, I guess it's official the army is giving up on hammers.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by ScottDLS »

bblhd672 wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Scott B. wrote:Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
Yeah. Also, current Army pistol is by Beretta an Italian company, though I'm pretty sure all the govt contract guns are made in US.

So once the Army, Marine Corps, and Air force get their SIGs, the Navy can start replacing their 1911's (which saw action against the Kaiser) with the left over Beretta's.... :smilelol5:
SEAL's have been using Sigs for a long time.
And newly minted Ensign OOD's on Destroyers have been using WWI leftover 1911's since the late '80's.... :evil2:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by The Annoyed Man »

dlh wrote:The timing of all this is quite interesting.

A few days back at General Mattis's hearing on Capitol Hill they made a big deal about how slow the Army was at deciding this and how much money they had spent then....whatta ya know! :)
An interesting observation! I wonder how much the Army was worried that, after all the wasted time and taxpayer dollars, the decision would be taken away from them if they waited beyond noon on 1/20/17 to make the decision. :lol:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Jago668
Senior Member
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Jago668 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
dlh wrote:The timing of all this is quite interesting.

A few days back at General Mattis's hearing on Capitol Hill they made a big deal about how slow the Army was at deciding this and how much money they had spent then....whatta ya know! :)
An interesting observation! I wonder how much the Army was worried that, after all the wasted time and taxpayer dollars, the decision would be taken away from them if they waited beyond noon on 1/20/17 to make the decision. :lol:
It is awfully convenient timing.
NRA Benefactor Member
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Jago668 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
dlh wrote:The timing of all this is quite interesting.

A few days back at General Mattis's hearing on Capitol Hill they made a big deal about how slow the Army was at deciding this and how much money they had spent then....whatta ya know! :)
An interesting observation! I wonder how much the Army was worried that, after all the wasted time and taxpayer dollars, the decision would be taken away from them if they waited beyond noon on 1/20/17 to make the decision. :lol:
It is awfully convenient timing.
Yep! :thumbs2:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

That acquisition program took some heat recently. Sounds like they...got off the pot.

Oddly, calls for the 320 were way up today. Wonder why? :patriot:
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”