Army chooses Sig

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

growlerVII
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 9:54 am

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by growlerVII »

Looks like the idiocy has started. I'll explain:
A little bit ago I made the decision to trade off a pistol for a p320. I'd been looking at them for awhile, hemming g and hawing. Made the leap to put my other pistol up for trade (5 days before the army's announcement) then all the p320's just disappeared. Saw a full sized used model for $1000 today. Lord, I hope it was a joke.
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

If somebody buys it, the seller is a genius. The buyer on the other hand....

Our calls on them are way up.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
ml1209
Senior Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:17 pm

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by ml1209 »

Does this mean people are going to be lining up to buy P320s?
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

ml1209 wrote:Does this mean people are going to be lining up to buy P320s?
They have been for a year. Interest is definitely up. That's partly why the contract is so import to a manufacturer, beyond the directly measurable value. My back-order on certain 320 models is approaching scary numbers.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
ml1209
Senior Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:17 pm

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by ml1209 »

Scott B. wrote:
ml1209 wrote:Does this mean people are going to be lining up to buy P320s?
They have been for a year. Interest is definitely up. That's partly why the contract is so import to a manufacturer, beyond the directly measurable value. My back-order on certain 320 models is approaching scary numbers.

I saw one at the pawn shop yesterday (actually it was the Sig P320C). Price was $450. It came with box, everything from the factory, and night sights. Should I buy?

BTW, the trigger was awesome.
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

ml1209 wrote:
Scott B. wrote:
ml1209 wrote:Does this mean people are going to be lining up to buy P320s?
They have been for a year. Interest is definitely up. That's partly why the contract is so import to a manufacturer, beyond the directly measurable value. My back-order on certain 320 models is approaching scary numbers.

I saw one at the pawn shop yesterday (actually it was the Sig P320C). Price was $450. It came with box, everything from the factory, and night sights. Should I buy?

BTW, the trigger was awesome.
Depending upon condition, that's a good price w/ night sights. One thing to check is if it has Gen 1 or Gen 2 configuration. If Gen 1, see if you can haggle them down more than you plan to.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by C-dub »

ScottDLS wrote:
Scott B. wrote:Sig Sauer Inc is an American company, now separate from Sig Sauer GmbH, and has really pushed the product line in interesting and fresh directions.
Yeah. Also, current Army pistol is by Beretta an Italian company, though I'm pretty sure all the govt contract guns are made in US.

So once the Army, Marine Corps, and Air force get their SIGs, the Navy can start replacing their 1911's (which saw action against the Kaiser) with the left over Beretta's.... :smilelol5:
Navy Fighter pilots had Beretta's when I was in back in the 80's.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
Flightmare
Senior Member
Posts: 3101
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Flightmare »

Image
Deplorable lunatic since 2016
rotor
Senior Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by rotor »

Wife has the P320Romeo (from Cabela) and she loves it. Red dot is nice to have with my aging eyes.
User avatar
TexDotCom
Senior Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 2:39 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by TexDotCom »

Confirmation that the Army has chosen 9mm for the caliber:

http://kitup.military.com/2017/01/modul ... _170201.nl


:txflag:
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Abraham »

Apparently, the complaints about the 9mm being too weak to be effective were either wrong or ignored by the Army.

I wonder what's the answer regarding their decision to stay with 9mm as their chosen pistol round?

Economics?

It's certainly less costly to shoot 9mm vs. a .45 caliber, and with a 9mm there's faster target reacquiring due to less recoil, but I do wonder why 9mm was kept as their chosen pistol round if it's not effective as some soldiers claim (or maybe they missed what they were shooting at a lot of times) and not some other caliber?

BTW, I like 9mm, I've 3 different firearms that shoot it.
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

NATO no doubt a factor. Cost, capacity, etc.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts: 4340
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

growlerVII wrote:Looks like the idiocy has started. I'll explain:
A little bit ago I made the decision to trade off a pistol for a p320. I'd been looking at them for awhile, hemming g and hawing. Made the leap to put my other pistol up for trade (5 days before the army's announcement) then all the p320's just disappeared. Saw a full sized used model for $1000 today. Lord, I hope it was a joke.
I'm seeing a new full size 320 available at Buds for $499 right now, so yes I hope it was a joke. Maybe it had a lot of custom work done?
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Abraham »

What makes the Sig 320 great?

Or, are they just so-so?
User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Army chooses Sig

Post by Scott B. »

Abraham wrote:What makes the Sig 320 great?

Or, are they just so-so?
Great? That's too early to say. It's a good gun.

In my opinion, it's brilliant from a maintenance standpoint. The rest is all personal opinion or preference. Anecdotally, we've had many officers who have converted to the 320 from one platform or another and swear by it.

Since the Army announcement, it's getting millions in free advertising and public exposure.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”