Photoman wrote:flintknapper wrote:I think that every person who values his/her gun rights....should make it a point to tactfully "turn up the heat" on other gun owners to pitch in and help. If this were to happen, the NRA and other organizations wouldn't need to have their "hand" out....constantly asking for much needed funds.
The NRA is not, primarily, a political activist organization.
My objection to the NRA is the way they represent the organization and raise funds. The majority of their fundraising strategies revolve around the "defense of the Second Amendment" yet the majority of the collected funds are spent on other projects.
From the NRA website:
"Because of these clearly defined parameters, and because only a small fraction of ILA’s operating budget comes from regular NRA membership dues, both ILA and NRA-PVF must continuously raise the funds needed to sustain NRA’s legislative and political activities. The resources expended in these arenas come from the generous contributions of NRA members—above and beyond their regular dues."
The vast majority of the millions and millions of membership dollars collected each year DO NOT go toward defense of "gun rights."
?????
Are you suggesting that an increase in membership (and money) would not benefit the NRA?
I know the organization has changed quite a bit in the 40 years I've been a member/supporter....but I think I still understand where the money and efforts are being spent.
Thank you for your thoughts however.
Flint.