Who's Miranda?...HerbM wrote: I will bet it was less than 30% (but I don't have any stats.) Maybe I will research the political and public reaction to Miranda....



sorry man, just kidding but couldn't resist. Keep up the good work.
Moderator: carlson1
Who's Miranda?...HerbM wrote: I will bet it was less than 30% (but I don't have any stats.) Maybe I will research the political and public reaction to Miranda....
No apology necessary -- it was FUNNY and it gave me another idea about Miranda v. HellerLedJedi wrote:Who's Miranda?...HerbM wrote: I will bet it was less than 30% (but I don't have any stats.) Maybe I will research the political and public reaction to Miranda....
![]()
![]()
![]()
sorry man, just kidding but couldn't resist. Keep up the good work.
I think she's Marshall Law's ex-wife.LedJedi wrote:Who's Miranda?...
After the 14th for me, it wasn't legally ratified, but that's another storyTommyGlock wrote:I'd be open to discussing it right after we repeal the 13th amendment.
That is the type of think I was thinking about. Most people thought like you parents, or "if he isn't guilty why not talk to the police?", or "he should know his own rights, the police shouldn't have to ENCOURAGE him to shut up", etc.seamusTX wrote:I remember when Miranda was decided (1966). My parents and people like them were outraged. They thought along the lines of "the police arrested him, so he's guilty." I still run into people like that when discussing subjects like search warrants and public defenders.
- Jim
[Edited to fix typos]
Or, in more modern parlance, "Going Sipowicz on him"HerbM wrote:Most people would have been opposed to physically harming the suspect, but "the third degree" was both a cliche and an expectation when the police had a "likely suspect."
DParker wrote:Or, in more modern parlance, "Going Sipowicz on him"HerbM wrote:Most people would have been opposed to physically harming the suspect, but "the third degree" was both a cliche and an expectation when the police had a "likely suspect."
DParker wrote:Or, in more modern parlance, "Going Sipowicz on him"HerbM wrote:Most people would have been opposed to physically harming the suspect, but "the third degree" was both a cliche and an expectation when the police had a "likely suspect."
And if anyone doesn't get that, well... "Next time you don't take a reference on account of your recent birth, do me a favor and keep that to yourself."DParker wrote:Or, in more modern parlance, "Going Sipowicz on him"