Texas M4??

"A pistol is what you use to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have left behind!" Clint Smith, Thunder Ranch

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Texas M4??

Post by dihappy »

Good deal for a first timer?


http://www.gtdist.com/ProductDetail.asp ... WA3F16M4TX" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


* A3 (removable) carry handle
* Stepped 16” chrome lined 1/9 “ barrel with flashhider
* Oversize hand guard
* 6 position butt stock with staked castle nut
* M4 feed cuts
* Carrier key screws staked
* Sling
* One 30 round magazine
* Hard case
* Texas Star Stamped
Image
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Texas M4??

Post by The Annoyed Man »

At today's prices, yes, that is probably a good price for a fully assembled M4. Bushmaster makes pretty good quality rifles. There are better rifles, but also lots of rifles that are not as good. I own a Bushmaster 24" Varminter, and I like it a lot. It is pretty accurate if I do my part. It functions very well, and I've never had a single malfunction with it.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
WarHawk-AVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: Texas M4??

Post by WarHawk-AVG »

Fair deal

Stepped 16” chrome lined 1/9 “ barrel with flash hider
You wont be able to shoot the heavier rounds...62 grain is about the highest you will be able to shoot and keep stable

With the massive volume of sales on AR style rifles its surprising the price isn't more...

Did you happen to see my Sub $600 AR link (you can select 16" barrel with either 1/9 or 1/7)...you can build about the same thing for less than $600 bucks (you have to buy a stripped receiver..but the rest of the "kit" has everything you need to build an AR just like that (that extra $200 could be then used for ammo!) [aka 500 rounds at aimsurplus.com for $179.95]

But for getting a "bushmaster" thats NOT a bad deal!
A sheepdog says "I will lead the way. I will set the highest standards. ...Your mission is to man the ramparts in this dark and desperate hour with honor and courage." - Lt. Col. Grossman
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmond Burke
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Texas M4??

Post by dihappy »

Thank you, now thats something that i didnt know.

So with a Chromoly i can shoot heavier rounds then?
Image
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Texas M4??

Post by The Annoyed Man »

dihappy wrote:Thank you, now thats something that i didnt know.

So with a Chromoly i can shoot heavier rounds then?
Must be...

My Bushmaster has a 1:9 barrel, and shoots the 68 and 69 grain SMKs the best, but it doesn't seem to like bullet weights under that either. It will function just fine with any bullet weight, but accuracy drops off above and below that 68-69 grain weight. OTH, my barrel is a 24" bull barrel and it is chrome moly, 8" longer than yours and not chrome lined, so maybe that makes a difference. My son's RRA with a 1:8 twist shoots the 75 and 77 grain SMKs the best, also from a 24" bull barrel, but his is stainless.

I'm still learning about all this AR stuff myself.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: Texas M4??

Post by Mike1951 »

It is the faster twist that allows you to shoot heavier bullets, not whether it is chomoly.

1:9 will stabilize heavier bullets than the earlier 1:12.

1:7 will stabilize heavier bullets than 1:9.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
User avatar
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Re: Texas M4??

Post by stevie_d_64 »

"Due to increased demand, we are currently out of stock on this item but we have many on order. We are still accepting new orders and will fulfill all orders placed in the order that they are received. Thank you for your patience."

Duh!!! I wonder why???
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
WarHawk-AVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: Texas M4??

Post by WarHawk-AVG »

Chromemoly is just the type of steel the barrel is made out of...light and very wear resistant (standard AR barrel material)

Chrome lined bore was made to lengthen the lifespan of the bore/rifling by putting a MUCH stronger coating that resists wear from the high velocity rounds.

1:8 twist is actually a very good rate..my brother has the bushmaster 20" bull barrel for varmint hunting...he says it stabilizes everything from 55 all the way up to the 77grainers. In fact his likes the heavier stuff the 75grain Hornadays gets 1/4" at 100 yards.
A sheepdog says "I will lead the way. I will set the highest standards. ...Your mission is to man the ramparts in this dark and desperate hour with honor and courage." - Lt. Col. Grossman
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmond Burke
dihappy
Senior Member
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Texas M4??

Post by dihappy »

Thats great info guys! THanks so much for educating me.

I now know what to look for or ask for when selecting a barrel.

I have another question.

Can anyone explain the difference between 5.56 and .223 lowers?

If i understood correctly, a 5.56 lower will accept both, but a .223 will only accept .223, is that correct?

And why is that? What differences dictate the round acceptability?

Is it better to get a 5.56 lower then?
Image
User avatar
nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas M4??

Post by nitrogen »

I think the upper matters more for .223/5.56.

I dont think the lower will matter.

In fact, for most people, they'd argue they are interchangable. I'd check what your barrel/upper is rated at. You should see a stamp on the barrel somewhere that'd say.

Technically, a rifle rated for 5.56 can shoot .223 but not the other way around.

If price isn't an object, go for 5.56. I'm pretty sure you can find something within your price range that'll take it. The parts I got from del-ton will.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous
KBCraig
Banned
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Re: Texas M4??

Post by KBCraig »

dihappy wrote:Can anyone explain the difference between 5.56 and .223 lowers?
Lowers don't have a caliber. Lowers don't accept ammo, they accept magazines; the magazines are the same.

For all practical purposes, 5.56 and .223 are the same (unlike 7.62 NATO and .308 Winchester).
User avatar
WEC
Senior Member
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:37 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Texas M4??

Post by WEC »

KBCraig wrote:
dihappy wrote:Can anyone explain the difference between 5.56 and .223 lowers?
Lowers don't have a caliber. Lowers don't accept ammo, they accept magazines; the magazines are the same.

For all practical purposes, 5.56 and .223 are the same (unlike 7.62 NATO and .308 Winchester).
I agree with nitrogen and KBCraig. Your only concern should be the upper. There has been a lot of discussion in the past, and I think what has been said as a rule of thumb is that if you have a 5.56, you can shoot 5.56 or .223. If you have a .223, stick to .223 and don't go 5.56. Here's a decent site explaining the subtle differences.
"We are oft to blame in this / 'Tis too much proved -- that with devotion's visage / And pious action we do sugar o'er / The devil himself."
Μολὼν λαβέ | NRA Lifetime Member
WarHawk-AVG
Senior Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:05 pm

Re: Texas M4??

Post by WarHawk-AVG »

nitrogen wrote:I think the upper matters more for .223/5.56.

I dont think the lower will matter.

In fact, for most people, they'd argue they are interchangable. I'd check what your barrel/upper is rated at. You should see a stamp on the barrel somewhere that'd say.

Technically, a rifle rated for 5.56 can shoot .223 but not the other way around.

If price isn't an object, go for 5.56. I'm pretty sure you can find something within your price range that'll take it. The parts I got from del-ton will.
True...if the chamber can handle hot loaded NATO combat ammo..it can handle civilian .223

The pressures you see between the designations are confusing..but the 5.56NATO wiki helps explain it better
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56x45mm_ ... _Remington" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Military cases are generally made from thicker brass than commercial cases; this reduces the powder capacity (an important consideration for handloaders[2]), and the NATO specification allows a higher chamber pressure. NATO EPVAT test barrels made for 5.56mm NATO measure chamber pressure at the case mouth, as opposed to the SAAMI location. This difference accounts for upwards of 140 MPa (20,000 psi) difference in pressure measurements. That means that the NATO EPVAT maximum pressure of 430 Mpa (62,366 psi) for 5.56mm NATO, is around 540 MPA (78,000 psi) tested in .223 Remington SAAMI test barrels

NATO brass is usually thicker and can handle more pressure...plus in order to facilitate many different manufacturers of NATO ammo the chamber is usually allowed a bit more "slop" in its dimensions which allow the brass to expand further...civilian thin walled ammo may stretch and get too thin and rupture..but you usually see that in multiple reloads of the same brass

Get the barrel specifying 5.56 not .223, otherwise do NOT shoot Milsurp ammo in it

And yes...7.62 NATO chambers are unsafe to shoot .308 Winchester...the slop in NATO can be in the very dangerous ranges for .308 Winchester brass...even though I have never talked to anyone that has personally seen a catastrophic kaboom. I still shoot Milsurp 7.62 NATO in my Ishapore 2A just to be safe.
A sheepdog says "I will lead the way. I will set the highest standards. ...Your mission is to man the ramparts in this dark and desperate hour with honor and courage." - Lt. Col. Grossman
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmond Burke
User avatar
flintknapper
Banned
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

Re: Texas M4??

Post by flintknapper »

KBCraig wrote: Lowers don't have a caliber. Lowers don't accept ammo, they accept magazines; the magazines are the same.
Yup, in fact the same lower (.223/5.56) could be used with a .458 SOCOM upper and also use the same magazines.


For all practical purposes, 5.56 and .223 are the same (unlike 7.62 NATO and .308 Winchester).
The cartridges are nearly identical, but you'll get greater pressure from the 5.56.

The chamber throat (Leade) is different....so you can shoot .223 from a 5.56 chambered barrel, but you may experience a slight loss in accuracy. Most folks don't recommend you shoot 5.56 in a .223 chambered barrel because of the possibility of a pressure spike (the Leade is shorter). There are reamers available to convert the .223 configuration to 5.56

For best accuracy and safety....use the ammo intended for the chamber of your particular weapon.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
Post Reply

Return to “Rifles & Shotguns”