M-16 From Vietnam
Moderator: carlson1
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
I believe its the A1 model and he did say something about the 1:14 twist. Nice site by the way!
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
If it doesn't have the forward assist, and the Wikipedia article is correct, it would have been a pre-'67 Air Force model. They don't mention anything about select fire, but do specifically mention that the Air Force model didn't have the forward assist, and the Army's model with the forward assist was standardized as the M16A1 in 1967.
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
While the Army might have standardized on M16A! in 67 there will thousands of them still around in the early 70s. The Army just didn't get rid of the all the old ones in 1967.Xander wrote:If it doesn't have the forward assist, and the Wikipedia article is correct, it would have been a pre-'67 Air Force model. They don't mention anything about select fire, but do specifically mention that the Air Force model didn't have the forward assist, and the Army's model with the forward assist was standardized as the M16A1 in 1967.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
Xander wrote:If it doesn't have the forward assist, and the Wikipedia article is correct, it would have been a pre-'67 Air Force model. They don't mention anything about select fire, but do specifically mention that the Air Force model didn't have the forward assist, and the Army's model with the forward assist was standardized as the M16A1 in 1967.
Uh FYI, the second paragraph of the introduction said "The US Air Force's rifle, the M16, and the US Army's rifle, the XM16E1, were the first versions of the M16 rifle fielded. Soon, the Army standardized the XM16E1 as the M16A1 rifle, an M16 with a forward assist feature requested by the Army. All of the early versions were chambered to fire the M193/M196 cartridge in the semi-automatic and the automatic firing modes."
NRA Life Member
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
The Army never had the model without the forward assist at all.Liberty wrote:While the Army might have standardized on M16A! in 67 there will thousands of them still around in the early 70s. The Army just didn't get rid of the all the old ones in 1967.Xander wrote:If it doesn't have the forward assist, and the Wikipedia article is correct, it would have been a pre-'67 Air Force model. They don't mention anything about select fire, but do specifically mention that the Air Force model didn't have the forward assist, and the Army's model with the forward assist was standardized as the M16A1 in 1967.
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
I have a friend that has one of these. 
It's semi auto and has the serial number only no manufacturer.

It's semi auto and has the serial number only no manufacturer.
- Captain Matt
- Senior Member
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:43 pm
- Location: blue water
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
I have no idea if he's telling tall tales or he stole government property or there's something else going on, but there's no separate switch. A real M16 the selector has safe, fire and a 3rd position.Daltex1 wrote:I am not trying to start anything but I gave it a good look-over and was "searching" for the full-suto or 3 shot burst selector switch. I was almost "growing" that switch on that gun, kinda like a doe when your hunting for a buck! I have no reason not to believe this man that he brought it back from NAM. He had to him I high security clearance but did not go much further on that issue.
"hic sunt dracones"
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
The selector is on the left side of the weapon and have Safe, Semi, Auto in that order clockwise. The photo showing on the previous post Looks like the first production of the M-16, but it doesn't have the forward assist to close an open breach.Captain Matt wrote:I have no idea if he's telling tall tales or he stole government property or there's something else going on, but there's no separate switch. A real M16 the selector has safe, fire and a 3rd position.Daltex1 wrote:I am not trying to start anything but I gave it a good look-over and was "searching" for the full-suto or 3 shot burst selector switch. I was almost "growing" that switch on that gun, kinda like a doe when your hunting for a buck! I have no reason not to believe this man that he brought it back from NAM. He had to him I high security clearance but did not go much further on that issue.
Married - Same woman over 42 years
Two children
Eight Grand children
Two Great Grand children
Army, 101st Airborne, 1963-1966
Vietnam Vet - 1965-1966
Ex-Texas Peace Officer (City Cop)
Utah CCW - Carry Taurus PT-111 Millennium Pro 9mm
Two children
Eight Grand children
Two Great Grand children
Army, 101st Airborne, 1963-1966

Vietnam Vet - 1965-1966
Ex-Texas Peace Officer (City Cop)

Utah CCW - Carry Taurus PT-111 Millennium Pro 9mm

Re: M-16 From Vietnam
You might also take a look at this page and the model guides http://www.retroblackrifle.com/ModGde.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. There are some photos of the some of the lowers. All of the '60's+ model actual M-16's I have ever seen were well marked Government Property like those in the photos. If you can get any kind of photo of the lower, that would be a big help in identifying it. 

Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
Thanks Keith for the link - The M-16 that was issued to me in 1964 is the one in this link with the early flash suppressor. http://www.retroblackrifle.com/ModGde/RflGde/603E1.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I was totally unaware of all the changes they made to the M-16 since that time. When we were issued the M-16, we were told that our unit was the first to change over to the M-16. I was with the 101st Airborne Division, 326 Engineer Battalion at Fort Campbell, KY. I was there from October 1963 to July 1965 at which time we boarded the USS General LeRoy Eltienge troop carrier to Vietnam, and with my M-16. Who knew we were test subjects.
Married - Same woman over 42 years
Two children
Eight Grand children
Two Great Grand children
Army, 101st Airborne, 1963-1966
Vietnam Vet - 1965-1966
Ex-Texas Peace Officer (City Cop)
Utah CCW - Carry Taurus PT-111 Millennium Pro 9mm
Two children
Eight Grand children
Two Great Grand children
Army, 101st Airborne, 1963-1966

Vietnam Vet - 1965-1966
Ex-Texas Peace Officer (City Cop)

Utah CCW - Carry Taurus PT-111 Millennium Pro 9mm

-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:45 am
Re: M-16 From Vietnam
I was an Air Force Security Policeman from 1976-78 we carried AR15 with A2 flash suppressors and triangle handguards even tho designated AR15 it had safe semi and full auto without a forward assist.The safety on the weapon is what controls the fire,if it points up semi if it has FA or burst capability the selector will face to the rear or 180 degrees from the safe position.It may be semi only or he may have told you it was semi only even if it was select fire
It is said that if you line up all the cars in the world end-to-end, someone would be stupid enough to try to pass them