surprise_i'm_armed wrote:HankB
What was unclear from the news coverage was whether she shot
THROUGH the door or if the door was OPEN when she fired.
If the door was closed it would have absorbed some of her rounds'
energy.
As far as shot placement goes, bad guys are much more active
than targets at the range. People try to avoid getting shot with movement.
She shot 3 times. She hit 3 times under stressful circumstances.
The guys got arrested. Let's give the gal her props for a job well done.
I very much agree with surprise_i'm_armed.
Let's remember that we shoot to end the threat, not to kill. This isn't just verbal camouflage for killing. It's the real objective of moral self defense, even though we recognize that there is a very high likelihood that death will be the outcome whenever deadly force is used to stop a deadly threat. That's why it's called "deadly force," not "fatal force."
In the case under discussion here, let's consider what the homeowner accomplished:
- 3 clearly lawfully justified shots under extreme life threatening circumstances
- 3 hits on dangerous, moving, attacking targets
- immediate cessation of the threat followed by the retreat of the attackers
- almost immediate arrest of the felons during a police response requested by the bad guys themselves
This is a 100% score in my book.