bdickens wrote:They can't at all.
True, they can't even post a 30.06 sign .... but I say "generally" due to the possiblity of a situation like the State Fair, where the PUBLIC property is leased out to some PRIVATE company who in effect practices a "constructive eviction" or rather a "constructive prohibition to enter" unless you allow them to illegally (in my layman's opinion) collect your personal private information at the discretion of the PRIVATE company who leased the PUBLIC Property which we have a right to use. Such as in this thread
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic. ... ir#p341361" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.bigtex.com/aboutus/history/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To protect this valuable community asset, the Texas State Fair spurned offers from developers and sold its property to the
City of Dallas in 1904 under an agreement that set aside a period each fall to hold the annual exposition.
See, although guns are a Second Amendment right, this concerns the State Fair as it relates to a First Amendment right
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=38355" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The city's response was that since it leases the property to the separate organization, State Fair of Texas, Inc., each year, the fair actually is a private event on private property and Rundus and others "had no constitutional rights inside the fair grounds." "In its ruling yesterday the
federal court determined that the Texas State Fair is a public place where constitutional rights are protected; as a result of the ruling, Mr. Rundus and others are now free to share their faith inside the fair grounds," the law firm said.
But at this point in time, no one seems to have remembered that when it concerns the Second Amendment.