Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
witchdoctor575
Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:22 pm
Location: alvin, tx

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by witchdoctor575 »

karder wrote:
mbw wrote:Your Kimber is a single action 1911 style pistol.

Hate to tell you this, but if you are joining HPD, the 1911 is not available for you to carry as a duty weapon. The only officers that can carry a 1911 are the ones grandfathered in years ago. I don't know about others like Harris County or the Constables, but with HPD it is a no go.
I'm curious, does anyone know what the reasoning is behind HPD's decision to not allow 1911s? I have always been a big fan of the design and my Colt Commander remains my favorite gun. I know Police Departments do a lot of research on these things (at least I think they do) and wonder why they would make a decision such as this.
prolly the same reason us customs banned them, too many negligent discharges with officers that "claimed" they just went off. when that happened my dad had to start using a H&K and he was less than amused.
texasmr2
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:48 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by texasmr2 »

CompVest wrote:I would strongly suggest that you get some good handgun training ASAP. It sounds like you are a novice handgunner and the profession you are interested in isn't the job for being a novice. There are several excellent instructors in the Houston area. If you are interested send me a PM and I will be pleased to suggest a couple of instructors.
I appreciate your advice yet I'm not a novice in any sense of the word it's just that I'm not a "gun porn" guy.
Peace Officer
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by Keith B »

texasmr2 wrote:
CompVest wrote:I would strongly suggest that you get some good handgun training ASAP. It sounds like you are a novice handgunner and the profession you are interested in isn't the job for being a novice. There are several excellent instructors in the Houston area. If you are interested send me a PM and I will be pleased to suggest a couple of instructors.
I appreciate your advice yet I'm not a novice in any sense of the word it's just that I'm not a "gun porn" guy.
No offense, but you claim to not be a novice, however, you are asking some VERY basic questions on handguns. I think Compvest's suggestion of working with an instructor might be well advised so you become more familiar with your weapon. There might even be a firearms instructor at the academy that would be willing to give you a little extra tutoring.

As far as carrying your own personal gun, most departments will not allow you to carry anything other than their issued weapon at minimum until you are off probation. And some departments will not allow you to carry anything that is not on their approved list of duty weapons. My department in Missouri would not allow a .45 years ago when I was a LEO and still will not. .40 is the maximum.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by AEA »

:iagree:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by casingpoint »

There is an 'old rule' about 1911's, that you should never need to touch the hammer, ever. If you are touching the hammer for some reason during carry or operation, then you are doing something wrong.
I thought the decocker was in the hammer. Also the recocker is in there, too. :mrgreen:
dicion
Senior Member
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by dicion »

casingpoint wrote:
There is an 'old rule' about 1911's, that you should never need to touch the hammer, ever. If you are touching the hammer for some reason during carry or operation, then you are doing something wrong.
I thought the decocker was in the hammer. Also the recocker is in there, too. :mrgreen:
Quote still stands :mrgreen:
There is no reason to manually decock a 1911, or subsequently recock it. The trigger works fine as both a decocker and recocker at the same time, with a bang inbetween "rlol"
1911's have been left cocked for over 50 years, and still functioned flawlessly when they were later found and shot :thumbs2:
texasmr2
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:48 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by texasmr2 »

Once again thanks for the input.

tex
Peace Officer
vinnier6
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by vinnier6 »

i didnt want to join this party, but since you are asking if a 1911 pistol is single action or double action, what you are telling us is that you dont know anything about pistols, otherwise you wouldnt have asked the question....heck, you went as far as to ask if you shot the thing would the next round get chambered!! that just flat out scares the crap out of me....

now the people here are just suggesting that you get the proper training that you need so you dont hurt yourself or anyone else.....
CCW Glock 23 or 27 Milt Sparks VM2
11/11/09 class, online application complete
11/18/09 application mailed
11/24/09 processing application
12/11/09 background check complete, sent to print
12/19/09 application complete, license issued
12/24/09 plastic in hand
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by The Annoyed Man »

casingpoint wrote:
There is an 'old rule' about 1911's, that you should never need to touch the hammer, ever. If you are touching the hammer for some reason during carry or operation, then you are doing something wrong.
I thought the decocker was in the hammer. Also the recocker is in there, too. :mrgreen:
Where does that put joecocker? :smilelol5:

Somebody... please... stop me. "rlol"
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Excaliber
Moderator
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by Excaliber »

Keith B wrote:
texasmr2 wrote:
CompVest wrote:I would strongly suggest that you get some good handgun training ASAP. It sounds like you are a novice handgunner and the profession you are interested in isn't the job for being a novice. There are several excellent instructors in the Houston area. If you are interested send me a PM and I will be pleased to suggest a couple of instructors.
I appreciate your advice yet I'm not a novice in any sense of the word it's just that I'm not a "gun porn" guy.
No offense, but you claim to not be a novice, however, you are asking some VERY basic questions on handguns. I think Compvest's suggestion of working with an instructor might be well advised so you become more familiar with your weapon. There might even be a firearms instructor at the academy that would be willing to give you a little extra tutoring.

As far as carrying your own personal gun, most departments will not allow you to carry anything other than their issued weapon at minimum until you are off probation. And some departments will not allow you to carry anything that is not on their approved list of duty weapons. My department in Missouri would not allow a .45 years ago when I was a LEO and still will not. .40 is the maximum.
Texasmr2, achieving a high degree of competence and proficiency with law enforcement weapon systems is not "gun porn" - it's a non negotiable requirement for anyone who aspires to serve the public as an LEO. As the former commander of training operations for a 200 officer agency, I can confirm that both CompVest and Keith B. have given you excellent advice that, if heeded, will pay big dividends down the road in the protection of both your life and your career. It's a very small investment for a very big return.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
gclooney
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:11 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by gclooney »

Comptac Minotaur gets my vote. Or AJC Conceal co.

The minotaur is goig to be more comfortable, however the AJC conceal co is a smaller type All leather rig.
texasmr2
Member
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:48 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Kimber "Pro Carry" .45 ACP

Post by texasmr2 »

Excaliber wrote:Texasmr2, achieving a high degree of competence and proficiency with law enforcement weapon systems is not "gun porn" - it's a non negotiable requirement for anyone who aspires to serve the public as an LEO. As the former commander of training operations for a 200 officer agency, I can confirm that both CompVest and Keith B. have given you excellent advice that, if heeded, will pay big dividends down the road in the protection of both your life and your career. It's a very small investment for a very big return.
I totally agree sir and I have mentioned that I truelly appreciate their advice. Anywho I went to the range yesterday and gained quite abit of competence and proficiency with the Kimber, it shot's like a dream and is a very accurate pistol. I put 120 round's thru it and could place my shot's spot on. I shot at the 15 yard range and not once did I miss the silhouette. I started out shooting for center mass then lower abdomen then throat and then head shot's and needless to say I outscored the 3 other cadets I was shooting with by a huge margin, they were all very impressed with the Kimber and my accuracy.

Concerning my novice stance the only reason I asked those question's was due to my lack of experience with that certain pistol, the Kimber. Remember the only stupid question is the one that is NOT asked ;-) :cheers2: . I scored 2nd highest in my CHL class at the range with a GLOCK .40cal and it was the first time I had ever shot a semi-auto and the first time I had shot a pistol, other than my brothers Thompson Contender .270, in 20yr's. Having been raised around firearm's and hunting and getting my first gun at age 7 I'm very comfortable with firearm's in general and become very comfortable and acclimated with them very quickly.

In closing I thank and appreciate you all who have helped me with this concern,
tex
Peace Officer
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”