GET OFF MY LAWN!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
He just ran the hoods off (or is in the process of doing it, I don't recall).jimlongley wrote:What is the context? I don't believe I have ever seen that scene.
This implies that either the journalist/officer believes that "military" ammunition/calibers are illegal to posses. I'm hoping this is not the case, but clearly the arresting officer doesn't know that AP ammo is legally defined as ammunition used in handguns. At least they said magazine instead of clip.Armor piercing rounds were found, when the officers got there and found the rifle, it was not loaded, but the magazine that was sitting next to the rifle was loaded with armor piercing rounds," said Austin Police Dept. Corporal Scott Perry.
Because of those military bullets, Yax was arrested for having a prohibited weapon. He is also charged with Aggravated Assault.
Sec. 46.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(12) "Armor-piercing ammunition" means handgun ammunition that is designed primarily for the purpose of penetrating metal or body armor and to be used principally in pistols and revolvers.
That's exactly what I thought. He's very fortunate that no one erhm..... aerated him.frazzled wrote: We should visualize this situation. We hear something outside. Look out and see someone with an AR (?) pointing it at the local kidlets.![]()
Thats a gunfire response waiting to happen. Lucky no one was hurt.
Keith B wrote:The DA should drop that charge and get him for assault.
A green tip is supposed to indicate a tracer round, and they are not illegal. However, I have seen tips on some painted black or green that is nothing but steel core.Aggie_engr wrote:Sooo, the green tip lake city ammo that is sold at just about each and every gun show I've been to in 1000 round packs, with numerous police officers present mind you, is illegal??? Tsk, tsk officers... Is it that hard to consult with someone that has slightly more knowledge on the subject instead of just slapping someone with charges?
Keith B wrote:The DA should drop that charge and get him for assault.
And he certainly isn't Clint Eastwood.gregthehand wrote:Or maybe he had an AR-15 pistol?
I don't think the ag assault charge was appropriate either. Deadly conduct seems more fitting for what he did. But honestly if he gets a good lawyer he may beat it all. All he will have to do is show them the penal code definition of armor piercing and that should be dropped if it was a rifle. Secondly if he can introduce a shadow of a doubt that he never actually pointed the weapon at the children the other charge should be dropped. Keep in mind I think he was wrong as could be. But whether he necessarily did anything stupid remains to be seen.
Actually come to think of it dropping all charges and then pleading guilty to disorderly conduct may be fitting. He did produce a firearm in public with intent to cause alarm.