Smith&Wesson 642 Range Report

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Smith&Wesson 642 Range Report

Post by casingpoint »

Well, the grip on the 360 tuns out to be just the original Bantam grip by Hogue. But, I can recall seeing something like a "Falcon" grip advertised with the new Bodyguard J frame revolver when it first made the S&W website. And I see the grip on some new J frames is something different than the old standby Uncle Mike's Boot Grip, which isn't bad in it's own right. But after a week carrying the Bantam around, I think I like it better. I'm sure those Trace grips are excellent. Never read a single complaint about them.

The three ounces difference between the Airweight and a 12 oz. Airlite mentioned by rdcraig by sure makes a lot of difference in recoil when shooting the same round. By the same token, you can sure feel those additional three ounces when carrying the Airweight.
User avatar
Mastodon
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: far-West Texas

Re: Smith&Wesson 642 Range Report

Post by Mastodon »

great gun.

I like my 442 with Hogue Bantam grips very much.
Chartered By The Republic of Texas in 1845

Image

NRA
TSRA

Μολών Λαβέ
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”