I submit that the student shooter you mention better guess right and get the one & only administrator that is armed if this passes. I further submit that if schools weren't such a soft target that the student shooter would be a lot less likely to BE a student shooter.JKDubb wrote:I think it is actually a tough question.
I do agree that the how the question is worded it is easy to say NO.
The problem with armed teahers is the student that shows up packing his arsenal is going to start with the administration since he/she knows who poses the most threat to stopping their attack.
Although I do not know of a viable alternative to arming the administration. There is only one sure way to stop a shooter...Shoot em'!
On one hand it is a good deterrent to anyone if they know they are out gunned, that is basic force protection. On the other hand history has tought us that these are suicide missions and the shooter is making an attempt to take out as many of their "enemies" as they can.
This whole student as shooter phenomenon seems like a relatively recent phenomenon to me (like about the last 15 years). Perhaps if we make schools a harder target the student shooter will resort to old fashioned methods (like talking) to resolve their differences instead of shooting up a school.